From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DFC13F458; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.249 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718034779; cv=none; b=LEknSRTeMwbJT0DYmQYKvvH8bloV7ceDCYsD6Ia03vgbru8GZOj5b+Vrc8v2O/7/+4MNNnyMETmBPnMU3NRTMLV3qYk9oJc7CvemPVq11e6X4ynttcj9XF9JGujUBGyipTWPHj+yVYDRFW4O04mM03HE9OEX1bUuPptTCE9Tks0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718034779; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jJ0lLOS8+GjQB/5OhMauyEXKdWa5z09hZgstiDsDy7E=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=K1ysUMSodXuQudBHecrcxWGbPKghlqHE2K1JAQVZM4NnWV42j0fYG6+cie+95zcfu7DDdW6q1wGrsbmOvl9KU0C3oj7UPkJNtmD6SM0RDNtAxMdmxHsVk2NqldVSejfJhS0QhDyJHfofsCGSHzfkA+OJYCWFMeO4XTwKx2MMK8E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=q4SLHeE6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.249 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="q4SLHeE6" Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 45AFqmiS024075; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:52:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1718034768; bh=FHTZhcWmvU7dwIjNS/g9TeU8//My8070jXlzryYYIHo=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=q4SLHeE6BpCCmsMxB6wpGWJYn9eCd0bKgRPrTe2uCeCLmz2k9gzFlaG+WmqBQl84L UlggX04ObFaQnlGlk+YzDcdHKloHwvRrre9Al/sK/oLGaRfcAOtTT30KEmM0cAc6mt DiJCdtwRSAyhViJnKjEjdR3w2a1wSPKj8GwCm0g0= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 45AFqmRC043958 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:52:48 -0500 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:52:47 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.249) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:52:47 -0500 Received: from [10.249.48.175] ([10.249.48.175]) by lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 45AFqlea069415; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:52:47 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:52:47 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Enable ipc with remote proc nodes To: Bryan Brattlof CC: , , , , , , , , References: <20240605124859.3034-1-hnagalla@ti.com> <20240605124859.3034-5-hnagalla@ti.com> <20240606171620.h3twptxb5mrxbqxh@bryanbrattlof.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Hari Nagalla In-Reply-To: <20240606171620.h3twptxb5mrxbqxh@bryanbrattlof.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 On 6/6/24 12:16, Bryan Brattlof wrote: >> + >> + c7x_0_memory_region: c7x-memory@99900000 { >> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; >> + reg = <0x00 0x99900000 0x00 0x01efffff>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> }; > This seems highly specific to the demos we're currently running for our > reference boards. If someone wants to develop their own app say with > Zypher they would instantly need to change this. > > If these absolutely need to be in here could they go in a TI-demo overly? > > ~Bryan Hey Bryan, You are correct, these carveouts match the TI provided firmware binaries. Ideally, these could go into an overlay. Just following the carveout model used with the rest of the TI SoCs (AM6x/J72x), to avoid confusion to the users.