mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 lena.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] udp: fix segmentation crash for untrusted source packet
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:41:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e826f337c3db612852c5f543d123ee53adc885bb.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313133402.9027-1-shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>

On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 21:34 +0800, Shiming Cheng wrote:
> Kernel exception is reported when making udp frag list segmentation.
> Backtrace is as below:
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:229
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:262
> features=features@entry=19, is_ipv6=false)
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:289
> features=19)
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:399
> features=19)
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:1418
> skb@entry=0x0, features=19, features@entry=0)
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/core/gso.c:53
> tx_path=<optimized out>)
>     at out/android15-6.6/kernel-6.6/kernel-6.6/net/core/gso.c:124

A full backtrace would help better understanding the issue.

> This packet's frag list is null while gso_type is not 0. Then it is treated
> as a GRO-ed packet and sent to segment frag list. Function call path is
> udp_rcv_segment => config features value
>     __udpv4_gso_segment  => skb_gso_ok returns false. Here it should be
>                             true. 

Why? If I read correctly the above, this is GSO packet landing in an
UDP socket with no UDP_GRO sockopt. The packet is expected to be
segmented again.

>				Failed reason is features doesn't
match
>                             gso_type.
>         __udp_gso_segment_list
>             skb_segment_list => packet is linear with skb->next = NULL
>             __udpv4_gso_segment_list_csum => use skb->next directly and
>                                              crash happens
> 
> In rx-gro-list GRO-ed packet is set gso type as
> NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 | NETIF_F_GSO_FRAGLIST in napi_gro_complete. In gso
> flow the features should also set them to match with gso_type. Or else it
> will always return false in skb_gso_ok. Then it can't discover the
> untrusted source packet and result crash in following function.

What is the 'untrusted source' here? I read the above as the packet
aggregation happened in the GRO engine???

Could you please give a complete description of the relevant scenario?

> Fixes: f2696099c6c6 ("udp: Avoid post-GRO UDP checksum recalculation")
> Signed-off-by: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lena Wang <lena.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  include/net/udp.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index 488a6d2babcc..c87baa23b9da 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ void udpv6_encap_enable(void);
>  static inline struct sk_buff *udp_rcv_segment(struct sock *sk,
>  					      struct sk_buff *skb, bool ipv4)
>  {
> -	netdev_features_t features = NETIF_F_SG;
> +	netdev_features_t features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 | NETIF_F_GSO_FRAGLIST;

This looks wrong: real UDP_L4 GSO packets will not segmented anymore
and should be dropped (?!?)



  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-13 13:34 Shiming Cheng
2024-03-13 15:41 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-03-15  8:12   ` Lena Wang (王娜)
2024-03-16 13:47     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-26 13:10       ` Lena Wang (王娜)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e826f337c3db612852c5f543d123ee53adc885bb.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lena.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shiming.cheng@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®