From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F626C04ABB for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59152086A for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Age0dHDw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B59152086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728179AbeIKWTs (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:19:48 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:41850 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727419AbeIKWTs (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:19:48 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w8BHJ57C080211; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:19:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1536686345; bh=G/7VGqi1rFlhqIKMBTA+KsBERCvp2xGLVWe2ysfFKVM=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Age0dHDwajrupu39b4eCMwtpnvp05bEwZhFAbTeRxbFmHPtMQ5Lmk/xQH+nWXR8Yl 5fclHey/jlKpVYWZVIalZd5GIRv8rSXFd6psG6GEBffnYyNVjFGB5nQOcaOCQ5bJAL gic2VToi8gW3O2cD3HijFqmuwlSsMvvZOl3rjMzc= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w8BHJ5A0002207; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:19:05 -0500 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:19:05 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:19:05 -0500 Received: from [172.22.156.248] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w8BHJ4TZ030912; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:19:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: ti-lmu: constify mfd_cell tables From: Dan Murphy To: Lee Jones CC: Pavel Machek , kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , , , , , , References: <20180829093108.GB22065@amd> <20180907093954.GA26364@amd> <20180911155355.GD4185@dell> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:18:57 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lee On 09/11/2018 12:08 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Lee > > On 09/11/2018 10:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018, Dan Murphy wrote: >> >>> Pavel >>> >>> On 09/07/2018 04:39 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> On Wed 2018-08-29 11:31:08, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>>> From: Sebastian Reichel >>>>> >>>>> mfd: ti-lmu: constify mfd_cell tables >>>>> >>>>> Add const attribute to all mfd_cell structures. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel >>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek >>>> >>>> Lee, I guess this is for you to apply. Any news there? >>>> >>>> There are more patches ready, >>> >>> As I stated in another email thread. I don't see the need for this level of LMU framework. >>> >>> Here is the reference thread >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/982550/ >> >> This driver has been present for 1.5 years. >> >> Is that a NACK for *this* patch or are you hijacking? :) >> > > Its a NACK for adding this. I am pushing a new series for the LM3697 and will end up > sending LED drivers for the non-MFD devices contained within. I will try to match the > feature set the best I can. > Sorry it is a NACK for adding the backlight series. This patch is fine. Dan -- ------------------ Dan Murphy