Re: [PATCH 3/4] lib: logic_pio: Introduce MMIO_LOWER_RESERVED

[John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>]

On 26/04/2020 12:47, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> That would allow platforms reserve some lower address in PIO MMIO range
> to deal with legacy drivers with hardcoded I/O ports that can't be
> managed by logic_pio.

Hi,

Is there some reason why the logic_pio code cannot be improved to handle 
these devices at these "fixed" addresses? Or do you have a plan to 
improve it? We already support fixed bus address devices in the INDIRECT 
IO region.

Carving out a region of IO space is less than ideal.

Thanks,
John

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
> ---
>   lib/logic_pio.c | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/logic_pio.c b/lib/logic_pio.c
> index f511a99bb389..57fff1cb7063 100644
> --- a/lib/logic_pio.c
> +++ b/lib/logic_pio.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
>   static LIST_HEAD(io_range_list);
>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(io_range_mutex);
>   
> +#ifndef MMIO_LOWER_RESERVED
> +#define MMIO_LOWER_RESERVED	0
> +#endif
> +
>   /* Consider a kernel general helper for this */
>   #define in_range(b, first, len)        ((b) >= (first) && (b) < (first) + (len))
>   
> @@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ int logic_pio_register_range(struct logic_pio_hwaddr *new_range)
>   	struct logic_pio_hwaddr *range;
>   	resource_size_t start;
>   	resource_size_t end;
> -	resource_size_t mmio_end = 0;
> +	resource_size_t mmio_end = MMIO_LOWER_RESERVED;
>   	resource_size_t iio_sz = MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT;
>   	int ret = 0;
>   
>