From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757769AbYESKjU (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 06:39:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755123AbYESKjJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 06:39:09 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:11765 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755101AbYESKjI (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 06:39:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NZEIl/XqO60gAZhDsmkHr+3VpZBWcF2ZUd+kARsp6WH0NwXufCAQj8xOqgFCAhUCLOuJpE5mYXkK7Xm4G1uHWvwWEfzydHxjJTDStnBZDHT2B1nDNbIAmRtWYy5A2ZZTNXoQZOWdOL9aNV7U8YmseZcFm336ZauYR6NMleL0MA0= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:39:07 +0200 From: Matthew To: "Jens Axboe" Subject: Re: performance "regression" in cfq compared to anticipatory, deadline and noop Cc: fchecconi@gmail.com, "Daniel J Blueman" , "Kasper Sandberg" , "Linux Kernel" , "Aaron Carroll" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080513122021.GP16217@kernel.dk> <20080513180334.GS16217@kernel.dk> <20080513184057.GU16217@kernel.dk> <6278d2220805140105x27292033u6a97dcf13ab54263@mail.gmail.com> <20080514082622.GA16217@kernel.dk> <20080514103956.GD16217@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I just wrote a bug-report as a reminder for this problem: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10746 I hope it's classified in the right subsystem & has enough information (2 links to this discussion) Jens, I just looked a little through lkml while searching for the above mentioned 2 links and found the following post: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/7/319 is it anyhow related to this issue ? Thanks Mat