mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: correct broken uapi for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:53:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e879ca95-25d7-d7b6-e811-81a5017ea5cf@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512381409-19775-1-git-send-email-brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 12/04/2017 10:56 AM, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> Perf tool bpf selftests revealed a broken uapi for s390 and arm64.
> With the BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type the bpf_perf_event
> structure exports the pt_regs structure for all architectures.
> 
> This fails for s390 and arm64 because pt_regs are not part of the
> user api and kept in-kernel only.  To mitigate the broken uapi,
> introduce a wrapper that exports pt_regs in an asm-generic way.
> For arm64, export the exising user_pt_regs structure.  For s390,
> introduce a user_pt_regs structure that exports the beginning of
> pt_regs.
> 
> Note that user_pt_regs must export from the beginning of pt_regs
> as BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type is not the only type for
> running BPF programs.
> 
> Some more background:
> 	For the bpf_perf_event, there is a uapi definition that is
> 	passed to the BPF program.  For other "probe" points like
> 	trace points, kprobes, and uprobes, there is no uapi and the
> 	BPF program is always passed pt_regs (which is OK as the BPF
> 	program runs in the kernel context).  The perf tool can attach
> 	BPF programs to all of these "probe" points and, optionally,
> 	can create a BPF prologue to access particular arguments
> 	(passed as registers).  For this, it uses DWARF/CFI
> 	information to obtain the register and calls a perf-arch
> 	backend function, regs_query_register_offset().  This function
> 	returns the index into (user_)pt_regs for a particular
> 	register.  Then, perf creates a BPF prologue that accesses
> 	this register based on the passed stucture from the "probe"
> 	point.
> 
> Part of this series, are also updates to the testing and bpf selftest
> to deal with asm-specifics.  To complete the bpf support in perf, the
> the regs_query_register_offset function is added for s390 to support
> BPF prologue creation.
> 
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
> - Correct kbuild test bot issues by including
>   asm-generic/bpf_perf_event.h for archictectures that do not have
>   their own asm version.
> - Added patch to clean-up whitespace and coding style issues in s390
>   asm/ptrace.h (#4/6) as suggested by Alexei.
> 
> 
> Hendrik Brueckner (6):
>   bpf: correct broken uapi for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type
>   s390/bpf: correct broken uapi for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program
>     type
>   arm64/bpf: correct broken uapi for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program
>     type
>   s390/uapi: correct whitespace & coding style in asm/ptrace.h
>   selftests/bpf: sync kernel headers and introduce arch support in
>     Makefile
>   perf s390: add regs_query_register_offset()

Series looks good to me, thanks for working on this Hendrik! If nobody
hollers, I would take the fixes via bpf tree later tonight.

Thanks,
Daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-05 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-04  9:56 Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-04  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] " Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-04  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/bpf: " Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-04  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64/bpf: " Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-04  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] s390/uapi: correct whitespace & coding style in asm/ptrace.h Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-04  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: sync kernel headers and introduce arch support in Makefile Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-04  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] perf s390: add regs_query_register_offset() Hendrik Brueckner
2017-12-05 15:53 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-12-05 23:51   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: correct broken uapi for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e879ca95-25d7-d7b6-e811-81a5017ea5cf@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®