From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vlad.wing@gmail.com, max@kutsevol.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
aehkn@xenhub.one, stable@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:NETWORKING [MPTCP]" <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mptcp: Ensure RCU read lock is held when calling mptcp_sched_find()
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:45:02 +0100 (GMT+01:00) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e891f590-7dd5-4207-adef-d90b90172aeb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241030140224.972565-1-leitao@debian.org>
Hi Breno
30 Oct 2024 15:02:45 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>:
> The mptcp_sched_find() function must be called with the RCU read lock
> held, as it accesses RCU-protected data structures. This requirement was
> not properly enforced in the mptcp_init_sock() function, leading to a
> RCU list traversal in a non-reader section error when
> CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST is enabled.
>
> net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>
> Fix it by acquiring the RCU read lock before calling the
> mptcp_sched_find() function. This ensures that the function is invoked
> with the necessary RCU protection in place, as it accesses RCU-protected
> data structures.
Thank you for having looked at that, but there is already a fix:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241021-net-mptcp-sched-lock-v1-1-637759cf061c@kernel.org/
This fix has even been applied in the net tree already:
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/3deb12c788c3
Did you not get conflicts when rebasing your branch on top of the
latest version?
> Additionally, the patch breaks down the mptcp_init_sched() call into
> smaller parts, with the RCU read lock only covering the specific call to
> mptcp_sched_find(). This helps minimize the critical section, reducing
> the time during which RCU grace periods are blocked.
I agree with Eric (thank you for the review!): this creates other issues.
> The mptcp_sched_list_lock is not held in this case, and it is not clear
> if it is necessary.
It is not needed, the list is not modified, only read with RCU.
Cheers,
Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 14:02 Breno Leitao
2024-10-30 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-30 15:05 ` Breno Leitao
2024-10-30 15:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-30 14:45 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2024-10-30 15:01 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e891f590-7dd5-4207-adef-d90b90172aeb@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=aehkn@xenhub.one \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=max@kutsevol.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®