From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, sophgo@lists.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and caching helper
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:04:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e89439cb-b4cc-44ca-99bd-977e4d659e47@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80f85ae9-7162-4940-8dec-690bc00098b4@rock-chips.com>
On 10/27/26 21:12, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> 在 2026/10/27 星期二 20:28, Hans Zhang 写道:
>> The DWC PCIe core and its platform drivers repeatedly call
>> dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP) to obtain the offset of the
>> PCI Express Capability structure. Besides being verbose, that performs a
>> DBI read every time, including in paths that run repeatedly such as link
>> up polling, suspend/resume and interrupt handlers.
>>
>> Add a pcie_cap field to struct dw_pcie and a helper
>> dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() that performs the lookup on first use and caches
>> the result for the subsequent calls.
>>
>> The lookup is deliberately done lazily, at the first place that needs the
>> offset, instead of at a fixed point during controller initialization.
>> This guarantees that the DBI read happens exactly when the open coded
>> dw_pcie_find_capability() call it replaces used to happen, so no DBI
>> access can be made before the controller clocks, resets and power are
>
>
> With the controller inaccessible (clocks/power gated), what a DBI
> read returns is platform dependent, most integrations just hang the
> accessing CPU, like Rockchip's SoCs, others might return zero or
> garbage. Zero self-heals as the commit message describes, but a garbage
> non-zero lookup would now be cached indefinitely, so every later caller
> would use a bogus offset?
>
> Perhaps the "TX Interface Progression Detection Features" of dwc IP
> could help return a dedicated value? I don't know, so I need to check
> it internally. I will get back to you later.
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
You are right that the cache must not turn a bogus value into a permanent
one. Some details and one change in v5:
- dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() is only called at the sites that previously
called dw_pcie_find_capability() directly, so this series does not add
or move a DBI access. It does not try to fix the "DBI accessed while
the controller is inaccessible" problem; that behavior is platform
specific and pre-existing.
- dw_pcie_find_capability() already rejects offsets below the standard
header, unaligned offsets, and entries whose capability ID is not
PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, so a bogus value has to look like a valid capability
entry to be returned at all.
- To make sure that a transient bogus read cannot stick anyway, v5 only
caches the offset after the capability ID has been read back at that
offset. If the read-back does not confirm PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, the offset is
still used for the current access (same as the open coded search
before), but it is not cached, and the next call searches again - the
same self-healing behavior as the zero/not-found case.
If the DWC IP has a reliable way to tell whether the core is accessible
(the "TX Interface Progression Detection" feature you mentioned), that
would be even better than validating the value. I would be glad to use it
if you can share the details; it probably deserves a separate patch so
that all DBI accesses can be guarded, not only this lookup.
Best regards,
Hans
>
>
>> enabled. This matters for endpoint controllers such as qcom-ep and
>> tegra194, where DBI is only accessible after PERST# is deasserted, and it
>> also means platform drivers do not have to call the helper from a
>> specific callback at the right time.
>>
>> The cached value is accessed with READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE(), because the
>> first lookup may be triggered from different contexts, for example the
>> qcom-ep global IRQ and PERST# IRQ handlers. A concurrent lookup stores
>> the same value, so this race is benign.
>>
>> A return value of 0 means that the capability is not present. This
>> cannot happen on real DWC hardware, where the PCI Express Capability is
>> mandatory, so a negative result is not cached separately: it only causes
>> the search to be repeated, which does not affect correctness.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/
>> pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> index 0735ae940924..fa31e8b763bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> @@ -592,6 +592,8 @@ struct dw_pcie {
>> * use_parent_dt_ranges to true to avoid this warning.
>> */
>> bool use_parent_dt_ranges;
>> +
>> + u8 pcie_cap; /* Offset of PCI_CAP_ID_EXP */
>> };
>> #define to_dw_pcie_from_pp(port) container_of((port), struct
>> dw_pcie, pp)
>> @@ -830,6 +832,38 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(struct
>> dw_pcie *pci)
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, val);
>> }
>> +/**
>> + * dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() - Return the PCIe Capability offset
>> + * @pci: DWC instance
>> + *
>> + * The offset of the PCI Express Capability structure is read once from
>> + * the DBI configuration space on the first call and cached in
>> + * @pci->pcie_cap for the subsequent ones.
>> + *
>> + * The lookup is done lazily at the first place that actually needs the
>> + * offset, so the DBI read happens exactly when it used to happen before
>> + * caching was introduced, i.e. never before the controller's clocks,
>> + * resets and power are enabled.
>> + *
>> + * DWC PCIe controllers always implement the PCI Express Capability,
>> so a
>> + * return value of 0 means that the hardware is not usable. Callers that
>> + * check the returned offset keep working, and the (never expected)
>> + * lookup is simply repeated on the next call.
>> + *
>> + * Return: the cached offset, or 0 if the capability is not present.
>> + */
>> +static inline u8 dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> +{
>> + u8 cap = READ_ONCE(pci->pcie_cap);
>> +
>> + if (!cap) {
>> + cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>> + WRITE_ONCE(pci->pcie_cap, cap);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return cap;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline int dw_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> {
>> if (pci->ops && pci->ops->start_link)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 12:28 [PATCH v4 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and caching helper Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 13:12 ` Shawn Lin
2026-10-28 3:04 ` Hans Zhang [this message]
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] PCI: dwc: meson: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] PCI: dwc: rockchip: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:36 ` Shawn Lin
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] PCI: dwc: eswin: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] PCI: dwc: fu740: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] PCI: dwc: intel-gw: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] PCI: dwc: qcom: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] PCI: dwc: spacemit-k1: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] PCI: dwc: spear13xx: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] PCI: dwc: tegra194: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] PCI: dwc: ultrarisc: " Hans Zhang
2026-10-27 23:15 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache " Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-28 2:10 ` Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e89439cb-b4cc-44ca-99bd-977e4d659e47@163.com \
--to=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=sophgo@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®