From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751349AbdFEOhp (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:37:45 -0400 Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:59120 "EHLO lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272AbdFEOhn (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:37:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device_id To: Lee Jones References: <1496567924-4278-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20170605103740.g4t3veigzpdzfkxi@dell> CC: , , , From: Keerthy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:07:37 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170605103740.g4t3veigzpdzfkxi@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 05 June 2017 04:07 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jun 2017, Keerthy wrote: > >> With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id >> is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new >> instead of probe. >> >> Keerthy (9): >> mfd: tps65217: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: tps65218: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: palmas: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: lp873x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: lp8788: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: lp3943: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: tps65086: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: tps65090: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> mfd: tps6586x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id >> >> drivers/mfd/lp3943.c | 11 ++--------- >> drivers/mfd/lp873x.c | 12 ++---------- >> drivers/mfd/lp8788.c | 11 ++--------- >> drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 15 ++------------- >> drivers/mfd/tps65086.c | 12 ++---------- >> drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 12 ++---------- >> drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 14 +++----------- >> drivers/mfd/tps65218.c | 9 +++++---- >> drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 12 ++---------- > > Are all of these drivers DT only? At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers. No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9. > >> 9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) > >