mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com>
To: <okaya@kernel.org>, <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>, <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: <baicar.tyler@gmail.com>, <Austin.Bolen@dell.com>,
	<Shyam.Iyer@dell.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <ruscur@russell.cc>,
	<sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>, <oohall@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Consistently use _OSC to determine who owns AER
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:36:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e92c6c4f33c84f23ae47137f4ecb11f0@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bac2c78a-cd56-7287-e4fd-6042e9b3432c@kernel.org>

On 11/20/2018 04:08 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> One version is:
> "if HEST table is present, ignore _OSC"
> or
> Another version is:
> "if HEST table is present, make sure that FW sets _OSC bit for AER to
> false. Otherwise, warn like crazy that this BIOS is broken and needs
> an update and can cause all sorts of trouble"

ACPI 6.2 Ch 6.2.11.3, Table 6-197
	PCI Express Advanced Error Reporting control

	The firmware sets this bit to 1 to grant control over PCI
	Express Advanced Error Reporting.
	If firmware allows the OS control of this feature, then in the
	context of the _OSC method it must ensure that error messages
	are routed to device interrupts as described in the PCI
	Express Base Specification. Additionally, after control is
	transferred to the OS, firmware must not modify the Advanced
	Error Reporting Capability. If control of this feature was
	requested and denied or was not requested, firmware returns
	this bit set to 0.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-15 23:16 Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-11-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/AER: Do not use APEI/HEST to disable AER services globally Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-11-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI/AER: Determine AER ownership based on _OSC instead of HEST Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-11-15 23:43   ` Keith Busch
2018-11-16  1:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Consistently use _OSC to determine who owns AER Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 16:53   ` Tyler Baicar
2018-11-19 16:53     ` Keith Busch
2018-11-19 17:32       ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 17:36         ` Keith Busch
2018-11-19 17:42         ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 17:41           ` Keith Busch
2018-11-19 17:56             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 18:10               ` Keith Busch
2018-11-19 18:24                 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 19:11                   ` Alex G.
2018-11-19 19:32                     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 20:16                       ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-19 20:33                         ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-19 23:49                           ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-20  1:54                             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-20 20:44                               ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-20 21:02                                 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-20 21:42                                   ` Keith Busch
2018-11-20 22:28                                     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-20 22:35                                       ` Alex G.
2018-11-20 21:46                                   ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-20 22:08                                     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-20 22:36                                       ` Alex_Gagniuc [this message]
2018-11-27 18:22                                       ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-27 18:32                                         ` Sinan Kaya
2018-11-27 18:46                                           ` Tyler Baicar
2018-11-16 12:37 ` David Laight
2019-03-05 23:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e92c6c4f33c84f23ae47137f4ecb11f0@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM \
    --to=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
    --cc=Austin.Bolen@dell.com \
    --cc=Shyam.Iyer@dell.com \
    --cc=baicar.tyler@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®