From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCABC67790 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58C720894 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="gnyXPwnV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D58C720894 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732623AbeG0LP1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 07:15:27 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:39284 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730475AbeG0LP0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 07:15:26 -0400 Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6R9qfDc010873; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 04:52:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1532685161; bh=EiFNRucd9iNx1pQMy77dLtPqlzIVRX4TVPU5qTrqitg=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gnyXPwnVSQZJV0LeRzTg/XlLaOsym/DhzLgoAx+CHkSmIbg6ujLhp4+x/bV3kLHHj pX6yb4PfBz+vmp8HdLXF3FOyvQwOJx8QCo2lmMvkF3Zy+wiu6qTu0fIH3cqh7ew4tn iVR+MyLyNOSMnVi5gCpXIbsUWWoLHR/+BebxzqJQ= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6R9qf2D018021; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 04:52:41 -0500 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 04:52:41 -0500 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 04:52:41 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6R9qX3e000517; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 04:52:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] net: davinci_emac: potentially get the MAC address from MTD From: Sekhar Nori To: Srinivas Kandagatla , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andrew Lunn CC: Linux ARM , Rob Herring , Florian Fainelli , David Lechner , Ivan Khoronzhuk , Kevin Hilman , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , Russell King , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bartosz Golaszewski , Grygorii Strashko , Ladislav Michl , , Lukas Wunner , , "David S . Miller" , Dan Carpenter References: <20180629094039.7543-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180629094039.7543-9-brgl@bgdev.pl> <03b77e24-9ab9-fa01-2387-9de0408a9942@gmail.com> <20180704070919.GA14051@lenoch> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:22:33 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 20 July 2018 10:34 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > There is a lot of follow-up traffic on how exactly to develop the needed > interfaces for reading mac address in mtd and/or network subsystem. > > But, I don't think any of that negates the need for nvmem lookups that > work for non-device-tree and populating the lookups in mach-davinci > board code. > > I am going to send patches 1-7 to ARM-SoC soon, so please do say if > there is any disagreement on this. I owed a response on this. After thinking over some and discussing with Bartosz as well, I decided not to merge any patches from this series. Its better to merge anything after the actual path we are talking is fully clear. Thanks, Sekhar