mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	sza@esh.hu, arnd@arndb.de,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	kbuild-all@01.org, benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] ARM: Fix dma_alloc_coherent() and friends for NOMMU
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:25:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9ab0dd0-17e5-b124-6637-3651fea86713@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608162555.GP4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

Greg?

On 08/06/17 17:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Well, I've no objection to this, but it does need acks from other
> people before I can apply it.
> 
> There's two patches that touch drivers/base that need Greg's ack.
> 
> I'm not sure what's happening with lib/dma-noop.c, there doesn't
> appear to be a maintainer list for it, so I guess that's a
> free-for-all.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:28:30AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> Ping!
>>
>> On 24/05/17 11:24, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> Short story:
>>>
>>> Without these patches coherent DMA is broken for András and Alexandre,
>>> so they cannot safely enable DMA on their platforms.
>>>
>>> Patches have been circulated on a list since last year without much
>>> attention to changes in dma-coherent.c and dma-noop.c. Meanwhile, ARM
>>> bits have been reviewed and there is no strict objection to get them
>>> merged. Unfortunately, applying only ARM bits doesn't help much and
>>> the original issue would still exist.
>>>
>>> Please, let me know how to move with this fix forward?
>>>
>>> Long story:
>>>
>>> It seems that addition of cache support for M-class CPUs uncovered
>>> latent bug in DMA usage. NOMMU memory model has been treated as being
>>> always consistent; however, for R/M CPU classes memory can be covered
>>> by MPU which in turn might configure RAM as Normal i.e. bufferable and
>>> cacheable. It breaks dma_alloc_coherent() and friends, since data can
>>> stuck in caches now or be buffered.
>>>
>>> This patch set is trying to address the issue by providing region of
>>> memory suitable for consistent DMA operations. It is supposed that
>>> such region is marked by MPU as non-cacheable. Robin suggested to
>>> advertise such memory as reserved shared-dma-pool, rather then using
>>> homebrew command line option, and extend dma-coherent to provide
>>> default DMA area in the similar way as it is done for CMA (PATCH
>>> 4/7). It allows us to offload all bookkeeping on generic coherent DMA
>>> framework, and it seems that it might be reused by other architectures
>>> like c6x and blackfin.
>>>
>>> While reviewing/testing previous versions of the patch set it turned
>>> out that dma-coherent does not take into account "dma-ranges" device
>>> tree property, so it is addressed in PATCH 3/7.
>>>
>>> For ARM, dedicated DMA region is required for cases other than:
>>>  - MMU/MPU is off
>>>  - cpu is v7m w/o cache support
>>>  - device is coherent
>>>
>>> In case any of the above conditions is true dma operations are forced
>>> to be coherent and wired with dma_noop_ops.
>>>
>>> To make life easier NOMMU dma operations are kept in separate
>>> compilation unit.
>>>
>>> Since the issue was reported at the same time as Benjamin sent his
>>> patch [1] to allow mmap for NOMMU, his case is also addressed in this
>>> series (PATCH 1/7 and PATCH 2/7).
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8633/1
>>>
>>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>>> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
>>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
>>> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> 	    v4 -> v5
>>> 	       - rebased on v4.12-rc2
>>> 	       - updated description for CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
>>>
>>> 	    v3 -> v4
>>> 	       - rebased on v4.11-rc7
>>> 	       - made CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE optional for CPU_V7M
>>> 	       - added Arnd's Acked-by
>>>
>>> 	    v2 -> v3
>>> 	       - fixed warnings reported by Alexandre and kbuild robot
>>>
>>> 	    v1 -> v2
>>> 	       - rebased on v4.11-rc1
>>> 	       - added Robin's Reviewed-by
>>> 	       - dedicated flag is introduced to use dev->dma_pfn_offset
>>> 	         rather than mem->device_base in case memory region is
>>> 		 configured via device tree (so Tested-by discarded there)
>>>
>>> 	RFC v6 -> v1
>>> 	       - dropped RFC tag
>>> 	       - added Alexandre's Tested-by
>>>
>>> Vladimir Murzin (7):
>>>   dma: Take into account dma_pfn_offset
>>>   dma: Add simple dma_noop_mmap
>>>   drivers: dma-coherent: Account dma_pfn_offset when used with device
>>>     tree
>>>   drivers: dma-coherent: Introduce default DMA pool
>>>   ARM: NOMMU: Introduce dma operations for noMMU
>>>   ARM: NOMMU: Set ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE for M-class cpus
>>>   ARM: dma-mapping: Remove traces of NOMMU code
>>>
>>>  .../bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt   |   3 +
>>>  arch/arm/Kconfig                                   |   1 +
>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h                 |   2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mm/Kconfig                                |   8 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mm/Makefile                               |   5 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c                    | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c                          |  29 +--
>>>  drivers/base/dma-coherent.c                        |  74 +++++-
>>>  lib/dma-noop.c                                     |  29 ++-
>>>  9 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
>>>
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-15  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-24 10:24 Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] dma: Take into account dma_pfn_offset Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 12:47     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dma: Add simple dma_noop_mmap Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 12:46     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-26  9:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] drivers: dma-coherent: Account dma_pfn_offset when used with device tree Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-20 13:50     ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-26  9:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 12:59     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drivers: dma-coherent: Introduce default DMA pool Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-20 14:24     ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-26  9:42       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-26 14:08         ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-27 14:36         ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-27 15:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 13:18     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-26  9:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] ARM: NOMMU: Introduce dma operations for noMMU Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: NOMMU: Set ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE for M-class cpus Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] ARM: dma-mapping: Remove traces of NOMMU code Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-08  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] ARM: Fix dma_alloc_coherent() and friends for NOMMU Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-08 16:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-15  7:25     ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2017-06-20 12:59       ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:00         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9ab0dd0-17e5-b124-6637-3651fea86713@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=sza@esh.hu \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®