From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763483AbXGXOAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:00:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756639AbXGXOAm (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:00:42 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:31719 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754258AbXGXOAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:00:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=J09Xb310i8TwT80oK2A6qK0Uvky+OLNHAca6IddSMXOb50SDl4g3aVcbc443kXRdnJBU9qRRUvVzb1+EBYLwwg1sDM+m7aKT2mEMhwQlfJJuHfJTSqYBYYqiYRA8l1EK+5nNNVIfDsxFf+9xMziecwORBgppyKoAbsxb6kswuzk= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:00:40 -0700 From: "Dan Williams" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot() Cc: "Jens Axboe" , "Alexey Dobriyan" , "Linus Torvalds" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mark.fasheh@oracle.com, "Nelson, Shannon" In-Reply-To: <20070724013455.691e6752.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070723132431.42afbae8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070723204045.GD5755@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20070723210153.GA5753@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20070723141137.171e4ac1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070723220446.GA5822@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20070723152712.02ded067.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070724081750.GM3287@kernel.dk> <20070724082207.GN3287@kernel.dk> <20070724013455.691e6752.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e58cbc86f29cc0a2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/24/07, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] > > What about the new async crypto stuff? I've been looking, but is it > > guarenteed that async_memcpy() runs in process context with interrupts > > enabled always? If not, there's a km type bug there. > > I think Shannon maintains that now. > I am looking after the async_tx API, I will send a patch to update MAINTAINERS shortly. -- Dan