From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762536AbZEHQYA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 12:24:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755161AbZEHQXs (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 12:23:48 -0400 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.29]:10712 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753140AbZEHQXr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 12:23:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=redi6AtslOsTmxef82Zd1MxBiGV+MeF5XalrekLA0n5ItQFO17YXtPSgTZp3lSiMqg rzUH6jyLfqt3xdqrZCmeiYLwnWOk0IW5GxILYnEp5hFrWaF9sRiY0NnUjZ7RNBApaQZZ 9xgH8KwOZ1Kp7MUWLDBvwDRt3I4rV0FKMnuy8= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A03F7A8.9090204@kernel.org> References: <1233456951-992-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <49F902CF.7080307@garzik.org> <49F903DD.8040707@kernel.org> <49FA0349.3090706@garzik.org> <49FEA127.1000905@kernel.org> <49FFB275.7000507@kernel.org> <4A03F7A8.9090204@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:23:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size From: Dan Williams To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, Mauelshagen@redhat.com, device-mapper development , heinzm@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ added heinzm@redhat.com ] On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Dan Williams wrote: >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Pushing this in the kernel without updating dm-raid is kind of >>> pointless.  Who should I be poking to get the userland part moving? >> >> Dmraid is not the only potential user.  Mdadm will also care about >> this as I have seen a report that points to a user having what looks >> like an HPA issue with an Intel(R) Matrix array.  So, there are two >> immediate users for this interface.  Heinz is the right person to poke >> for dmraid updates.  I'll handle the mdadm update. > > Alright, then.  With Jeff's reluctant ack and scheduled mdadm update, > I guess this one can go upstream.  I'll refresh the patchset and > repost.  Umm... BTW do I have Heinz's mail address right? Heinz, here is the whole thread: http://marc.info/?t=123345711600004&r=1&w=2