From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31rc5 RAID10 lockdep report - sysfs_nofity_dirent locking issue
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:12:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20909151512y48d066a9m71d4bb92e34b5294@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19066.28054.65288.171564@notabene.brown>
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday August 4, gregkh@suse.de wrote:
>> >
>> > Greg: does that look right? If so I'll add a changelog entry and
>> > submit it properly (after at least a compile test...)
>>
>> Yes, it looks correct, if it passes your tests :)
>
> Thanks.
> I've tested it and documented it now and so am happy to submit it.
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:42:08 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] Allow sysfs_notify_dirent to be called from interrupt context.
>
> sysfs_notify_dirent is a simple atomic operation that can be used to
> alert user-space that new data can be read from a sysfs attribute.
>
> Unfortunately is cannot currently be called from non-process context
> because of it's use of spin_lock which is sometimes taken with
> interrupt enabled.
>
> So change all lockers of sysfs_open_dirent_lock to disable interrupts,
> thus making sysfs_notify_dirent safe to be called from non-process
> context (as drivers/md does in md_safemode_timeout).
>
> sysfs_get_open_dirent is (documented as being) only called from
> process context, so it uses spin_lock_irq. Other places
> use spin_lock_irqsave.
>
> The usage for sysfs_notify_dirent in md_safemode_timeout was
> introduced in 2.6.28, so this patch is suitable for that and more
> recent kernels.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
Greg?
Looks like this never made it upstream, and now Hans is hitting this
in his tests.
Thanks,
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-15 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-04 14:14 2.6.31rc5 RAID10 lockdep report Dave Jones
2009-08-04 21:13 ` 2.6.31rc5 RAID10 lockdep report - sysfs_nofity_dirent locking issue NeilBrown
2009-08-04 21:24 ` Greg KH
2009-08-06 5:43 ` Neil Brown
2009-09-15 22:12 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-09-15 22:25 ` Greg KH
2009-09-15 23:05 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9c3a7c20909151512y48d066a9m71d4bb92e34b5294@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®