From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBD5517A586; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751910897; cv=none; b=QDppdhr7AWGIvNVfzTYwVBNbjP/y8RlDAmlDMZkprNsbRKXHi6WTcGEjx9C/bjgHxQjzEkqIL5GCvOqr/yqxLuf9VnctMrlthWAS42mTlaoNKaIwQTFsqZN+Kiyq4ow4Exbz6/Gm/+8TgH/Xp1OJFC13KOoQ2fDuqpxbAt6ShXk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751910897; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xNdHILS8uuNMxndmG3CePcg7M6g/2CWdtLuV2/WPBsw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=U07lNAxehkKkX4Ki+J6FLl9VaDNFAecLQS3sq21aK/FDVsRzKHQGG3kBJH/z1C5N4kc3mVUZ00id/ndwGUN1h8YCVtUorSiDrfK+YUXkObqDqjevTioYwiLIiVzhatvF0Lm2TmsuKNDcZwzt6e5HFyTB8j3CBD8+tJ0fOmSTiVo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=qSyu8ff6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="qSyu8ff6" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bbX2701LkzlgqV5; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:54:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1751910892; x=1754502893; bh=xNdHILS8uuNMxndmG3CePcg7 M6g/2CWdtLuV2/WPBsw=; b=qSyu8ff6Cdrt0/HK+5reY9VtML3XD0w6mgvohymQ HH1EeLA/a0PJ6IaI8wuwnbM/1Oq21QNcI+KvZvMtBoOpiKsTlMBQdGHWDxnOCqwA E+Ddlih9zVOfqj1f0xVSPQsuuIeDU0JuFKCrc9UJIp//k7hCSS4hAtGl+zIZxO9r T2A5qSm0sREurcl0JhE58dqlBMmDzggyzXi/9VS8X2ybrqvektDncK1qEQuAELGs zxerIMskDXo/6uIVXB5s++mvF2Wwu5bZ7mWTS9MGqfRywyHQ7H/7Qc9QNWApK29S IyUUx1e/BhvNkyXeTUf7VaPLb3z/jkMppHMlgnM9IlJGcw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id TuuHLUpGomHe; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bbX1v6j5ZzlgqV0; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:54:41 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 5/5] ufs: ufs-qcom: Kill ufshcd_res_info To: Konrad Dybcio , Manivannan Sadhasivam , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Asutosh Das , Stanley Chu Cc: Marijn Suijten , Can Guo , Nitin Rawat , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio References: <20250704-topic-qcom_ufs_mcq_cleanup-v1-0-c70d01b3d334@oss.qualcomm.com> <20250704-topic-qcom_ufs_mcq_cleanup-v1-5-c70d01b3d334@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20250704-topic-qcom_ufs_mcq_cleanup-v1-5-c70d01b3d334@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/4/25 10:36 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > This is not used by any driver and doesn't seem like it's going to be. > Remove it. The above description seems misleading to me. I think it should say that previous patches from this series removed all users of what is removed by this patch rather than suggesting that what has been removed never had any users. Bart.