Re: [PATCH] mm/memory.c: do_numa_page(): remove a redundant page table read

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 28.02.24 04:41, John Hubbard wrote:
> do_numa_page() is reading from the same page table entry, twice, while
> holding the page table lock: once while checking that the pte hasn't
> changed, and again in order to modify the pte.
> 
> Instead, just read the pte once, and save it in the same old_pte
> variable that already exists. This has no effect on behavior, other than
> to provide a tiny potential improvement to performance, by avoiding the
> redundant memory read (which the compiler cannot elide, due to
> READ_ONCE()).
> 
> Also improve the associated comments nearby.
> 
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   mm/memory.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 0bfc8b007c01..df0711982901 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4928,18 +4928,18 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   	int flags = 0;
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * The "pte" at this point cannot be used safely without
> -	 * validation through pte_unmap_same(). It's of NUMA type but
> -	 * the pfn may be screwed if the read is non atomic.
> +	 * The pte cannot be used safely until we verify, while holding the page
> +	 * table lock, that its contents have not changed during fault handling.
>   	 */
>   	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
> -	if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), vmf->orig_pte))) {
> +	/* Read the live PTE from the page tables: */
> +	old_pte = ptep_get(vmf->pte);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!pte_same(old_pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
>   		pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   
> -	/* Get the normal PTE  */
> -	old_pte = ptep_get(vmf->pte);
>   	pte = pte_modify(old_pte, vma->vm_page_prot);
>   
>   	/*

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb