mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bard.liao@intel.com,
	Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: qcom: adjust autoenumeration timeout
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:19:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9f4001d-a9f4-fae7-521a-76f8880ba82b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429160928.24614-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>



On 4/29/22 11:09, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Currently timeout for autoenumeration during probe and bus reset is set to
> 2 secs which is really a big value. This can have an adverse effect on
> boot time if the slave device is not ready/reset.
> This was the case with wcd938x which was not reset yet but we spent 2
> secs waiting in the soundwire controller probe. Reduce this time to
> 1/10 of Hz which should be good enough time to finish autoenumeration
> if any slaves are available on the bus.

Can I ask why this is dependent on a software configuration you have no control on?

Why not simply:

#define TIMEOUT_MS		100

?

> 
> Reported-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> index da1ad7ebb1aa..432e5cb9a4d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
>  
>  #define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID	0xF
>  #define MAX_FREQ_NUM		1
> -#define TIMEOUT_MS		(2 * HZ)
> +#define TIMEOUT_MS		(HZ/10)
>  #define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN	0x1
>  #define QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS	14
>  #define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ	9600000

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-29 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 16:09 Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-04-29 16:19 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-04-29 16:32   ` Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9f4001d-a9f4-fae7-521a-76f8880ba82b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_srivasam@quicinc.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®