mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yekai(A)" <yekai13@huawei.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: Kai Ye via Linux-accelerators 
	<linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: hisilicon/qm - defining the device isolation strategy
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:07:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea132cfd-801f-e7f2-57b5-58b7ed12f501@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220616144547.00003093@Huawei.com>



On 2022/6/16 21:45, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> ...
>
>>>
>>>> +	hw_err->tick_stamp = jiffies;
>>>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(err, tmp, &qm->uacce_hw_errs, list) {
>>>
>>> These are ordered (I think). Could take advantage of that by
>>> maintaining count of elements in parallel to the list then walking
>>> list in right direction + stop when you reach last one to need
>>> deleting.
>>>
>>
>> thanks, The current list + jiffies solution seems more simple.
>
> If list always remains relatively short then that's probably fine.
>
>>>
>>>> +		if ((hw_err->tick_stamp - err->tick_stamp) / HZ >
>>>> +		    SECONDS_PER_HOUR) {
>>>> +			list_del(&err->list);
>>>> +			kfree(err);
>>>> +		} else {
>>>> +			count++;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +	}
>>>> +	list_add(&hw_err->list, &qm->uacce_hw_errs);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (count >= isolate->hw_err_isolate_hz)
>>>> +		atomic_set(&isolate->is_isolate, 1);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> +static int hisi_qm_isolate_strategy_write(struct uacce_device *uacce,
>>>> +						const char *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct hisi_qm *qm = uacce->priv;
>>>> +	unsigned long val = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +#define MAX_ISOLATE_STRATEGY	65535
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (atomic_read(&qm->uacce_ref))
>>>> +		return -EBUSY;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* must be set by PF */
>>>> +	if (atomic_read(&qm->isolate_data.is_isolate) || uacce->is_vf)
>>>
>>> Why is the file visible on the vf?  Hide it or don't register it for vfs.
>> Because VF devices can be registered with UACCE. So this file node can
>> be visited on the vf. We're not sure if someone else's device is the
>> same as qm. So i configure it this way by driver. the 'isolate_strategy'
>> must be set by pf.
>>
>
> If possible have the uacce registration from the driver provide information
> on whether this applies to the VF.  Much better to have no file presented
> by the VF than one that always returns an error code.
>
> Jonathan
>
> .
>

Yes, I will provide some information here for VF.

thanks

Kai

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-17  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 12:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] crypto: hisilicon - supports device isolation feature Kai Ye
2022-06-14 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] uacce: " Kai Ye
2022-06-14 12:42   ` Greg KH
2022-06-15  8:52   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-15  9:06     ` yekai(A)
2022-06-14 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: add a isolation strategy vfs node for uacce Kai Ye
2022-06-14 12:41   ` Greg KH
2022-06-15  8:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-15  9:18       ` yekai(A)
2022-06-14 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: hisilicon/qm - defining the device isolation strategy Kai Ye
2022-06-14 12:43   ` Greg KH
2022-06-14 13:24     ` yekai(A)
2022-06-14 13:29       ` Greg KH
2022-06-15  9:10         ` yekai(A)
2022-06-14 14:12   ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-15 13:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-16  1:33     ` yekai(A)
2022-06-16 13:45       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-17  2:07         ` yekai(A) [this message]
2022-06-14 12:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] uacce: supports device isolation feature Kai Ye
2022-06-14 14:14   ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-15  1:07     ` yekai(A)
2022-06-14 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: add a isolation strategy vfs node for uacce Kai Ye
2022-06-14 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] crypto: hisilicon/qm - defining the device isolation strategy Kai Ye
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-14 12:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] crypto: hisilicon - supports device isolation feature Kai Ye
2022-06-14 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: hisilicon/qm - defining the device isolation strategy Kai Ye

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea132cfd-801f-e7f2-57b5-58b7ed12f501@huawei.com \
    --to=yekai13@huawei.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome