From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-100.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-100.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D21A2032D for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.100 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764556901; cv=none; b=FUNBA0Qs4RD8K9luEsgGzTFO78Y7JJO/R6SdBvZVWP+f+Jl4QWIHdwFf/QCc/RKjjonG6gMRVYlncTZmNQQj31g+0M9wo8w74d+DzNa28A0vZzqc4HVDITw8oEQdMV8MC7ZIdWlawolLL/PXsLY5s42r2wvg2Qm7SOWSAyTfH50= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764556901; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q1VPSfsdBpwrewJuCJzbRV+6uXNVl4CMxwpXBbZtgwQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=p8/uuER6WhWtQSgaaihq5HAx43jL4j5i1IbWVLzY6GNSyBeTr7snxfOyzyWXVFMESmsMXTxBCAZyWM8FmJtp8guJW3+XatrT6Gw8wEf+IXhwwO+BOL/l+J86WbOn+pGNcyYxuwKs5MkZrmM18VvHigFEhYhers0IqAiSMPUT9kk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=XxbUeOph; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.100 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="XxbUeOph" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1764556891; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=IRV0SSnaKOp4bOmHFQSp0jfAZP/w8Kb5KU2roZRI6Y8=; b=XxbUeOphAE2rIkjVZVvNcvj2rzgDRuvAbqyCr2x13EaWcepgRCsngRhynaiLG0crMP4T5vDxHGnjn2C/gOZHxUvGcVAVIyj0oZZJwY0U7r6CHHjPLGE+CJRlmL1C1T75gfWIT17kwMH6EcGwXNX38ZLtj1MDu3sWU++5Iojz1rg= Received: from 30.221.148.135(mailfrom:jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Wtl.jsE_1764556890 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 01 Dec 2025 10:41:30 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 10:41:29 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: switch on-disk header `erofs_fs.h` to MIT license To: Gao Xiang , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: LKML References: <20251201023816.1045273-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jingbo Xu In-Reply-To: <20251201023816.1045273-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/1/25 10:38 AM, Gao Xiang wrote: > Switch to the permissive MIT license to make the EROFS on-disk format > more interoperable across various use cases. > > It was previously recommended by the Composefs folks, for example: > https://github.com/composefs/composefs/pull/216#discussion_r1356409501 > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang > --- > fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h > index 3d5738f80072..e24268acdd62 100644 > --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h > +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR Apache-2.0 */ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ > /* > * EROFS (Enhanced ROM File System) on-disk format definition > * Acked-by: Jingbo Xu -- Thanks, Jingbo