From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com,
Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 5/8] block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:52:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea23e4d6-bdf8-ed2a-afbc-04a39f360a32@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221103162623.10286-6-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
On 11/4/22 01:26, Paolo Valente wrote:
> From: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com>
>
> Similarly to sync bfq_queues, also async bfq_queues need to be split
> on a per-actuator basis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> block/bfq-iosched.h | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index f44bac054aaf..c94b80e3f685 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2673,14 +2673,16 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_end_wr(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> void bfq_end_wr_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> struct bfq_group *bfqg)
> {
> - int i, j;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> - for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++)
> - if (bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j])
> - bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j]);
> - if (bfqg->async_idle_bfqq)
> - bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_idle_bfqq);
> + int i, j, k;
> +
> + for (k = 0; k < bfqd->num_actuators; k++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++)
> + if (bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k])
> + bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k]);
> + if (bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k])
> + bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k]);
> + }
> }
>
> static void bfq_end_wr(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
> @@ -5620,18 +5622,18 @@ static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
>
> static struct bfq_queue **bfq_async_queue_prio(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> struct bfq_group *bfqg,
> - int ioprio_class, int ioprio)
> + int ioprio_class, int ioprio, int act_idx)
> {
> switch (ioprio_class) {
> case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
> - return &bfqg->async_bfqq[0][ioprio];
> + return &bfqg->async_bfqq[0][ioprio][act_idx];
> case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE:
> ioprio = IOPRIO_BE_NORM;
> fallthrough;
> case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE:
> - return &bfqg->async_bfqq[1][ioprio];
> + return &bfqg->async_bfqq[1][ioprio][act_idx];
> case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE:
> - return &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq;
> + return &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[act_idx];
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -5805,7 +5807,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
>
> if (!is_sync) {
> async_bfqq = bfq_async_queue_prio(bfqd, bfqg, ioprio_class,
> - ioprio);
> + ioprio,
> + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio));
> bfqq = *async_bfqq;
> if (bfqq)
> goto out;
> @@ -7022,13 +7025,15 @@ static void __bfq_put_async_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> */
> void bfq_put_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg)
> {
> - int i, j;
> + int i, j, k;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> - for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++)
> - __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j]);
> + for (k = 0; k < bfqd->num_actuators; k++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++)
> + __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k]);
>
> - __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq);
> + __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k]);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> index e27897d66a0f..f1c2e77cbf9a 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> @@ -976,8 +976,8 @@ struct bfq_group {
>
> void *bfqd;
>
> - struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS];
> - struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq;
> + struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
> + struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
>
> struct bfq_entity *my_entity;
>
> @@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ struct bfq_group {
> struct bfq_entity entity;
> struct bfq_sched_data sched_data;
>
> - struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS];
> - struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq;
> + struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
> + struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
>
> struct rb_root rq_pos_tree;
> };
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-03 16:26 [PATCH V6 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator drives Paolo Valente
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 1/8] block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 0:18 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-11-26 16:28 ` Paolo Valente
2022-11-28 14:32 ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-06 8:04 ` Paolo Valente
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 2/8] block, bfq: forbid stable merging of queues associated with different actuators Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 0:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 3/8] block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 0:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 4/8] block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 0:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-06 8:00 ` Paolo Valente
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 5/8] block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 0:52 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 6/8] block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queue Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 1:01 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-06 8:06 ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-06 8:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-06 8:41 ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-06 9:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-06 15:43 ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-06 23:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-08 10:43 ` Paolo Valente
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 7/8] block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuators Paolo Valente
2022-11-21 1:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH V6 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among " Paolo Valente
2022-11-10 15:25 ` Arie van der Hoeven
2022-11-20 7:29 ` Paolo Valente
2022-11-20 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
2022-11-20 23:41 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea23e4d6-bdf8-ed2a-afbc-04a39f360a32@opensource.wdc.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davidezini2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=rory.c.chen@seagate.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®