From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
To: a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baolin.wang@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: sprd: Add new RTC power down check method
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 17:18:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea3bed8a6cb9493a7b0162f144de8a5ee4f06777.1527757194.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> (raw)
We should use the new method to check if RTC was powered down, which
is more solid. Since we have introduced power control and power status
registers, and we just check if the power status is the default value
(0x96), if yes that means the RTC has been powered down. Meanwhile We
can set the power control register to be one valid value to change
the power status to indicate RTC device is valid now.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-sc27xx.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sc27xx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sc27xx.c
index 6a3876e..deea5c3 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sc27xx.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sc27xx.c
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
#define SPRD_RTC_DAY_ALM_VALUE 0x4c
#define SPRD_RTC_SPG_VALUE 0x50
#define SPRD_RTC_SPG_UPD 0x54
+#define SPRD_RTC_PWR_CTRL 0x58
+#define SPRD_RTC_PWR_STS 0x5c
#define SPRD_RTC_SEC_AUXALM_UPD 0x60
#define SPRD_RTC_MIN_AUXALM_UPD 0x64
#define SPRD_RTC_HOUR_AUXALM_UPD 0x68
@@ -86,7 +88,13 @@
/* SPG values definition for SPRD_RTC_SPG_UPD register */
#define SPRD_RTC_POWEROFF_ALM_FLAG BIT(8)
-#define SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG BIT(9)
+
+/* power control/status definition */
+#define SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_VALUE 0x96
+#define SPRD_RTC_POWER_STS_CLEAR GENMASK(7, 0)
+#define SPRD_RTC_POWER_STS_SHIFT 8
+#define SPRD_RTC_POWER_STS_VALID \
+ (~SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_VALUE << SPRD_RTC_POWER_STS_SHIFT)
/* timeout of synchronizing time and alarm registers (us) */
#define SPRD_RTC_POLL_TIMEOUT 200000
@@ -383,7 +391,6 @@ static int sprd_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
{
struct sprd_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
time64_t secs = rtc_tm_to_time64(tm);
- u32 val;
int ret;
ret = sprd_rtc_set_secs(rtc, SPRD_RTC_TIME, secs);
@@ -391,27 +398,20 @@ static int sprd_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
return ret;
if (!rtc->valid) {
- /*
- * Set SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG to indicate now RTC has valid
- * time values.
- */
- ret = regmap_update_bits(rtc->regmap,
- rtc->base + SPRD_RTC_SPG_UPD,
- SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG,
- SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG);
+ /* Clear RTC power status firstly */
+ ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->base + SPRD_RTC_PWR_CTRL,
+ SPRD_RTC_POWER_STS_CLEAR);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(rtc->regmap,
- rtc->base + SPRD_RTC_INT_RAW_STS,
- val, (val & SPRD_RTC_SPG_UPD_EN),
- SPRD_RTC_POLL_DELAY_US,
- SPRD_RTC_POLL_TIMEOUT);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(rtc->dev, "failed to update SPG value:%d\n",
- ret);
+ /*
+ * Set RTC power status to indicate now RTC has valid time
+ * values.
+ */
+ ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->base + SPRD_RTC_PWR_CTRL,
+ SPRD_RTC_POWER_STS_VALID);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
rtc->valid = true;
}
@@ -562,15 +562,16 @@ static int sprd_rtc_check_power_down(struct sprd_rtc *rtc)
u32 val;
int ret;
- ret = regmap_read(rtc->regmap, rtc->base + SPRD_RTC_SPG_VALUE, &val);
+ ret = regmap_read(rtc->regmap, rtc->base + SPRD_RTC_PWR_STS, &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
/*
- * If the SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG was not set, which means the RTC has
- * been powered down, so the RTC time values are invalid.
+ * If the RTC power status value is SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_VALUE, which
+ * means the RTC has been powered down, so the RTC time values are
+ * invalid.
*/
- rtc->valid = (val & SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG) ? true : false;
+ rtc->valid = val == SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_VALUE ? false : true;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-31 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-31 9:18 Baolin Wang [this message]
2018-05-31 9:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea3bed8a6cb9493a7b0162f144de8a5ee4f06777.1527757194.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--to=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®