From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793014206; b=wEy2YmgIutKIFmUTp0AzZFE1FF6cYVuzCP7z0F8AJHv1SNEdgEmomGxygYnMXYDcG+Zh HXIfyiWwj6zsfBsHhIyj4oQAFtkh7wPr/52UiU0lpMNl5bxiYT4jPj6syINQsJv++lW5W 0lxlHUwvxUhAEkukQDC6zIR4nYOqtH7ZVbjdVxJQmQPBIx9AHZL0Qi+DoH18vlykGeKxj VwLDs0PFreIFHhaLtWLJm3miEIHGEuNVwRJ8eddhjBZFCdW8i/W2CgkKl8wtwF8EvpwXA kfSL9bSLkjzIWvgFKdatASwU0pA+5/4qAjHgBDeyyxWGg1rCW6Pd8+1AegU/Lq9ihOg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793014206; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent: Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Content-Language:Autocrypt:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=iClfX9ozOF/woLXVn0LlRbJhaticE1zUNij0OSGeYsI=; b=RlphnF9fNwnGO1wP/ZC3CTJm4hJ2BEoPGpTwwdKkiXJnqJ5MOwJ8CiqVMCxvAd1L8ry6 PpXlaVoYt8MXvo0JioXjxn1JRsfsll0g/5CQ+IZFF9K3iXpaNhhzcsE+/yyPzqwRPj4uY 9RvmzrcQTOOsY+iwnDFtmGFncQvqcPK40iY+nT24Zk7T5f1GSgbld05EOS5sfBc6Qw+eB oIOQiW4znMgxrl2j4hUng2k1SAkvo/d9ED4XUMBI5km3GQi2mNGyWgb+8TlDwCqQ9Eyjm S/bufI/grGJwaMWtMVmguCanmTqV4uImfaLmqlMu3mA4vt9Ibq/3PAhtzLDCzOYMmBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=R6xjyQPW; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17501606A325 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=R6xjyQPW Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B78D1F01828; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:30:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793014205; bh=iClfX9ozOF/woLXVn0LlRbJhaticE1zUNij0OSGeYsI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=R6xjyQPWBjiuYXew3w3sfn4+CzEysPk0vzqWiQIv5pJt56ssZjMobDW3D8wF8ogVT 1RxFwlq31/AyZhuFaanPLtGT3usurakSt1TmWR2b2uWPnfEFzNVmyLaLABttLcHgGp mFXEbIi4s5hnW8k7Uiy8CaoWdgJNNy84TMHQzQQnF9wDWqY+IV6KUQPGPbZ/jVbR88 QYBSJBzA9d+OXYu8pQaJFEFlLRmR0J/deJoxsjji9/iBkkpQPYPBZrvbQt70I1fxH2 +ya3dLzgrd25M7uGgv72s/e1cqEyeX1yx2p455bfR1Ng/B5ksE/aG7gUUG/z1AKh25 Fmb2plckH6erQ== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:20:40 +0100 X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: memory: fix truncation removing mapped folios To: Baolin Wang , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, jack@suse.cz, pfalcato@suse.de, ayushr@modal.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4cc521a118564b4145edf0324066ab532fb41181.1792979870.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <8779b778-c124-49ff-8072-2c995394ed8e@linux.alibaba.com> From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzS5EYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCAoQ3VycmVudCkgPGRhdmlkQGtlcm5lbC5vcmc+wsGQBBMBCAA6AhsDBQkmWAik AgsJBBUKCQgCFgICHgUCF4AWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3AP+DWgUCaYJt/AIZAQAKCRBN 3hD3AP+DWriiD/9BLGEKG+N8L2AXhikJg6YmXom9ytRwPqDgpHpVg2xdhopoWdMRXjzOrIKD g4LSnFaKneQD0hZhoArEeamG5tyo32xoRsPwkbpIzL0OKSZ8G6mVbFGpjmyDLQCAxteXCLXz ZI0VbsuJKelYnKcXWOIndOrNRvE5eoOfTt2XfBnAapxMYY2IsV+qaUXlO63GgfIOg8RBaj7x 3NxkI3rV0SHhI4GU9K6jCvGghxeS1QX6L/XI9mfAYaIwGy5B68kF26piAVYv/QZDEVIpo3t7 /fjSpxKT8plJH6rhhR0epy8dWRHk3qT5tk2P85twasdloWtkMZ7FsCJRKWscm1BLpsDn6EQ4 jeMHECiY9kGKKi8dQpv3FRyo2QApZ49NNDbwcR0ZndK0XFo15iH708H5Qja/8TuXCwnPWAcJ DQoNIDFyaxe26Rx3ZwUkRALa3iPcVjE0//TrQ4KnFf+lMBSrS33xDDBfevW9+Dk6IISmDH1R HFq2jpkN+FX/PE8eVhV68B2DsAPZ5rUwyCKUXPTJ/irrCCmAAb5Jpv11S7hUSpqtM/6oVESC 3z/7CzrVtRODzLtNgV4r5EI+wAv/3PgJLlMwgJM90Fb3CB2IgbxhjvmB1WNdvXACVydx55V7 LPPKodSTF29rlnQAf9HLgCphuuSrrPn5VQDaYZl4N/7zc2wcWM7BTQRVy5+RARAA59fefSDR 9nMGCb9LbMX+TFAoIQo/wgP5XPyzLYakO+94GrgfZjfhdaxPXMsl2+o8jhp/hlIzG56taNdt VZtPp3ih1AgbR8rHgXw1xwOpuAd5lE1qNd54ndHuADO9a9A0vPimIes78Hi1/yy+ZEEvRkHk /kDa6F3AtTc1m4rbbOk2fiKzzsE9YXweFjQvl9p+AMw6qd/iC4lUk9g0+FQXNdRs+o4o6Qvy iOQJfGQ4UcBuOy1IrkJrd8qq5jet1fcM2j4QvsW8CLDWZS1L7kZ5gT5EycMKxUWb8LuRjxzZ 3QY1aQH2kkzn6acigU3HLtgFyV1gBNV44ehjgvJpRY2cC8VhanTx0dZ9mj1YKIky5N+C0f21 zvntBqcxV0+3p8MrxRRcgEtDZNav+xAoT3G0W4SahAaUTWXpsZoOecwtxi74CyneQNPTDjNg azHmvpdBVEfj7k3p4dmJp5i0U66Onmf6mMFpArvBRSMOKU9DlAzMi4IvhiNWjKVaIE2Se9BY FdKVAJaZq85P2y20ZBd08ILnKcj7XKZkLU5FkoA0udEBvQ0f9QLNyyy3DZMCQWcwRuj1m73D sq8DEFBdZ5eEkj1dCyx+t/ga6x2rHyc8Sl86oK1tvAkwBNsfKou3v+jP/l14a7DGBvrmlYjO 59o3t6inu6H7pt7OL6u6BQj7DoMAEQEAAcLBfAQYAQgAJgIbDBYhBBvZyq1zXEw6Rg38yk3e EPcA/4NaBQJonNqrBQkmWAihAAoJEE3eEPcA/4NaKtMQALAJ8PzprBEXbXcEXwDKQu+P/vts IfUb1UNMfMV76BicGa5NCZnJNQASDP/+bFg6O3gx5NbhHHPeaWz/VxlOmYHokHodOvtL0WCC 8A5PEP8tOk6029Z+J+xUcMrJClNVFpzVvOpb1lCbhjwAV465Hy+NUSbbUiRxdzNQtLtgZzOV Zw7jxUCs4UUZLQTCuBpFgb15bBxYZ/BL9MbzxPxvfUQIPbnzQMcqtpUs21CMK2PdfCh5c4gS sDci6D5/ZIBw94UQWmGpM/O1ilGXde2ZzzGYl64glmccD8e87OnEgKnH3FbnJnT4iJchtSvx yJNi1+t0+qDti4m88+/9IuPqCKb6Stl+s2dnLtJNrjXBGJtsQG/sRpqsJz5x1/2nPJSRMsx9 5YfqbdrJSOFXDzZ8/r82HgQEtUvlSXNaXCa95ez0UkOG7+bDm2b3s0XahBQeLVCH0mw3RAQg r7xDAYKIrAwfHHmMTnBQDPJwVqxJjVNr7yBic4yfzVWGCGNE4DnOW0vcIeoyhy9vnIa3w1uZ 3iyY2Nsd7JxfKu1PRhCGwXzRw5TlfEsoRI7V9A8isUCoqE2Dzh3FvYHVeX4Us+bRL/oqareJ CIFqgYMyvHj7Q06kTKmauOe4Nf0l0qEkIuIzfoLJ3qr5UyXc2hLtWyT9Ir+lYlX9efqh7mOY qIws/H2t In-Reply-To: <8779b778-c124-49ff-8072-2c995394ed8e@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10/26/26 12:02, Baolin Wang wrote: > > > On 10/26/26 6:00 PM, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: >> On 10/26/26 03:05, Baolin Wang wrote: >>> Ayush reported an issue that shmem/tmpfs folios are still mapped when >>> truncating them on production: >>> " >>> BUG: Bad page cache in process ...  pfn:... >>> page dumped because: still mapped when deleted >>> " >>> >>> I reproduced the issue with Ayush's reproducer [1] with the latest mm-unstable >>> branch, and I got the following crash info. From the dump message, we can >>> see that truncate_inode_folio() is really trying to remove mapped folios, >>> which is incorrect. >>> >>> " >>> [  189.171977] page: refcount:3 mapcount:1 mapping:00000000fe168ee1 >>> index:0x3880 pfn:0x191647 >>> [  189.171995] memcg:ffff0000cc073d40 >>> [  189.171997] aops:shmem_aops ino:3c01 dentry name(?):"memfd:runsc-memory" >>> [  189.172006] flags: 0x17fffef0002022d(locked|referenced|uptodate|lru| >>> workingset|swapbacked|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x3ffff) >>> ....... >>> [  189.172017] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_mapped(folio)) >>> [  189.172026] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> [  189.172027] kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:155! >>> [  189.172057] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1]  SMP >>> ....... >>> [  189.177721] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 5521 Comm: repro Kdump: loaded Tainted: >>> 7.3.0-rc4+ #277 PREEMPT(lazy) >>> ....... >>> [  189.183986] Call trace: >>> [  189.184124]  filemap_unaccount_folio+0xf0/0x1e8 (P) >>> [  189.184391]  __filemap_remove_folio+0x34/0x160 >>> [  189.184633]  filemap_remove_folio+0x4c/0xb0 >>> [  189.184859]  truncate_inode_folio+0x34/0x58 >>> [  189.185087]  shmem_undo_range+0x220/0x658 >>> [  189.185308]  shmem_fallocate+0x2f0/0x470 >>> [  189.185527]  vfs_fallocate+0x128/0x328 >>> ...... >>> [  189.187078]  el0t_64_sync+0x184/0x188 >>> " >>> >>> After analysis, I believe the race exists between truncation and MADV_DONTNEED, >>> and shmem's ->map_pages() merely makes the issue easier to reproduce. Since >>> MADV_DONTNEED synchronously releases the pagetable page before calling >>> tlb_flush_rmaps(), this could cause another thread's truncation to skip >>> zap_pte_range() (due to pmd is none) but still observe the folio's mapcount >>> as non-zero. A possible race scenario is as follows: >>> >>> CPU 0                           CPU 1 >>> shmem_fallocate                 madvise_dontneed_single_vma >>>    unmap_mapping_range            ....... >>>    ...... >>>    (filemap_map_pages() remap folios) >>>                   zap_pte_range >>>    truncate_inode_folio            zap_empty_pte_table(pmd clear) >>>      unmap_mapping_folio >>>      ...... >>>        zap_pmd_range (saw pmd none, skip) >>> >>>    filemap_remove_folio >>>      BUG_ON(folio_mapped) >>>                                      tlb_flush_rmaps(remove rmaps) >>> >>> To fix this issue, we should move the pmd clear operation (via >>> zap_empty_pte_table()) >>> to after tlb_flush_rmaps() and use sync_with_folio_pmd_zap() to sync with >>> concurrent zapping, so that when we find a pmd_none() while unmapping a folio >>> without holding the PTL, the folio's mappings are guaranteed to have been >>> removed via tlb_flush_rmaps(). >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260925065013.3682431-1-ayushr@modal.com/ >>> Reported-by: Ayush Ranjan >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260924061708.1645968-1-ayushr@modal.com/ >>> Fixes: 6375e95f381e ("mm: pgtable: reclaim empty PTE page in >>> madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)") >>> Acked-by: Qi Zheng >>> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato >>> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) >>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang >>> --- >>> Changes from v3: >>>   - Collect review tags from Qi, Pedro and Lorenzo. Thanks. >>>   - Update the related comments per Lorenzo. >>> Changes from v2: >>>   - Use use sync_with_folio_pmd_zap() to sync with concurrent zapping (Per >>> David). >>> Changes from v1: >>>   - Add an smp_rmb() to pair with the smp_wmb() (Per Lorenzo and Pedro). >>> --- >>>   mm/internal.h | 10 ++++++---- >>>   mm/memory.c   | 28 +++++++++++++++------------- >>>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h >>> index b1b0f29d2216..ffb8eaec90e3 100644 >>> --- a/mm/internal.h >>> +++ b/mm/internal.h >>> @@ -584,14 +584,16 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct >>> unmap_desc *desc); >>>   void pmd_install(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pgtable_t *pte); >>>     /** >>> - * sync_with_folio_pmd_zap - sync with concurrent zapping of a folio PMD >>> + * sync_with_folio_pmd_zap - sync with concurrent zapping of folios >>>    * @mm: The mm_struct. >>>    * @pmdp: Pointer to the pmd that was found to be pmd_none(). >>>    * >>>    * When we find a pmd_none() while unmapping a folio without holding the PTL, >>> - * zap_huge_pmd() may have cleared the PMD but not yet modified the folio to >>> - * indicate that it's unmapped. Skipping the PMD without synchronization could >>> - * make folio unmapping code assume that unmapping failed. >>> + * zap_huge_pmd() may have cleared the PMD but not yet updated the folio >>> + * mapcount, and zap_empty_pte_table() clears the PMD only after the rmaps >>> + * for the table have been removed, but nothing orders the pmd_none() read >>> + * against later mapcount reads. Skipping the PMD without synchronization >>> + * could make folio unmapping code assume that unmapping failed. >>>    * >>>    * Wait for concurrent zapping to complete by grabbing the PTL. >>>    */ >>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c >>> index e911e63ba1ed..6a93b7fa48b2 100644 >>> --- a/mm/memory.c >>> +++ b/mm/memory.c >>> @@ -2036,6 +2036,15 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather >>> *tlb, >>>           } >>>       } while (pte += nr, addr += PAGE_SIZE * nr, addr != end); >>>   +    add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss); >>> +    lazy_mmu_mode_disable(); >>> + >>> +    /* Do the actual TLB flush before dropping ptl */ >>> +    if (force_flush) { >>> +        tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb); >>> +        tlb_flush_rmaps(tlb, vma); >>> +    } >>> + >>>       /* >>>        * Fast path: try to hold the pmd lock and unmap the PTE page. >>>        * >>> @@ -2043,18 +2052,12 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather >>> *tlb, >>>        * to hold the pmd lock failed, then we need to recheck all pte entries >>>        * to ensure they are still none, thereby preventing the pte entries >>>        * from being repopulated by another thread. >>> +     * >>> +     * Clear the PMD after the rmaps for the table have been removed, in case >>> +     * an incorrect mapcount is observed after unmapping the folio. >>>        */ >>>       if (can_reclaim_pt && direct_reclaim && addr == end) >>>           direct_reclaim = zap_empty_pte_table(mm, pmd, ptl, &pmdval); >>> - >>> -    add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss); >>> -    lazy_mmu_mode_disable(); >>> - >>> -    /* Do the actual TLB flush before dropping ptl */ >>> -    if (force_flush) { >>> -        tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb); >>> -        tlb_flush_rmaps(tlb, vma); >>> -    } >>>       pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl); >>>         /* >>> @@ -2102,12 +2105,11 @@ static inline unsigned long zap_pmd_range(struct >>> mmu_gather *tlb, >>>                   continue; >>>               } >>>               /* fall through */ >>> -        } else if (details && details->single_folio && >>> -               folio_test_pmd_mappable(details->single_folio) && >>> -               next - addr == HPAGE_PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(*pmd)) { >>> -            sync_with_folio_pmd_zap(tlb->mm, pmd); >>>           } >>> + >>>           if (pmd_none(*pmd)) { >>> +            if (details && details->single_folio) >>> +                sync_with_folio_pmd_zap(tlb->mm, pmd); >>>               addr = next; >>>               continue; >>>           >> Sorry if I sound annoyed, but why don't you keep the >> >> } else if (pmd_none(*pmd)) { >> >> above as I suggested? >> >> Because we fancy unnecessary PMD table lock cycles? > > Ah, sorry, I misunderstood what you meant before [1]. Yes, this is still correct > and looks good to me. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/179c26ed-1764-4e5b- > a7ee-047ddabbfea1@linux.alibaba.com/ > > Do you want me to respin a new version or just apply the following diff? > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index 6a93b7fa48b2..d9c54549b85b 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -2105,9 +2105,7 @@ static inline unsigned long zap_pmd_range(struct > mmu_gather *tlb, >                                 continue; >                         } >                         /* fall through */ > -               } > - > -               if (pmd_none(*pmd)) { > +               } else if (pmd_none(*pmd)) { >                         if (details && details->single_folio) >                                 sync_with_folio_pmd_zap(tlb->mm, pmd); >                         addr = next; That's not the correct fixup I think. Please send a new version with the correct one ;) -- Cheers, David