From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] dmaengine: pl330: Don't require irq-safe runtime PM
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:50:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea75ca9a-efc0-2d47-d6ef-fd32e675db49@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170213154727.GN2843@localhost>
Hi Vinod,
On 2017-02-13 16:47, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Although, I don't know of other examples, besides the runtime PM use
>>>> case, where non-atomic channel prepare/unprepare would make sense. Do
>>>> you?
>>> The primary ask for that has been to enable runtime_pm for drivers. It's not
>>> a new ask, but we somehow haven't gotten around to do it.
>> Okay, I see.
>>
>>>>> As I said earlier, if we want to solve that problem a better idea is to
>>>>> actually split the prepare as we discussed in [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> This way we can get a non atomic descriptor allocate/prepare and release.
>>>>> Yes we need to redesign the APIs to solve this, but if you guys are up for
>>>>> it, I think we can do it and avoid any further round abouts :)
>>>> Adding/re-designing dma APIs is a viable option to solve the runtime PM case.
>>>>
>>>> Changes would be needed for all related dma client drivers as well,
>>>> although if that's what we need to do - let's do it.
>>> Yes, but do bear in mind that some cases do need atomic prepare. The primary
>>> cases for DMA had that in mind and also submitting next transaction from the
>>> callback (tasklet) context, so that won't go away.
>>>
>>> It would help in other cases where clients know that they will not be in
>>> atomic context so we provide additional non-atomic "allocation" followed by
>>> prepare, so that drivers can split the work among these and people can do
>>> runtime_pm and other things..
>> That for sharing the details.
>>
>> It seems like some dma expert really need to be heavily involved if we
>> ever are going to complete this work. :-)
> Sure, I will help out :)
>
> If anyone of you are in Portland next week, then we can discuss these f2f. I
> will try taking a stab at the new API design next week.
I'm not going to Portland, but I hope that you will have a fruitful
discussion
there.
[...]
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-14 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20170209142307eucas1p2592bbad82dbbffc56bbd993f5a890981@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-02-09 14:22 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] DMA Engine: switch PL330 driver to non-irq-safe " Marek Szyprowski
[not found] ` <CGME20170209142307eucas1p180323d005f524760913b8d04ac966423@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2017-02-09 14:22 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] dmaengine: Add new device_{set,release}_slave callbacks Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-10 4:34 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-10 12:07 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-13 1:42 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-13 11:48 ` Marek Szyprowski
[not found] ` <CGME20170209142308eucas1p24d52db3d52e19228e8f423c3dc8b085b@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-02-09 14:22 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] dmaengine: pl330: remove pdata based initialization Marek Szyprowski
2017-03-22 8:22 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-03-27 4:34 ` Vinod Koul
[not found] ` <CGME20170209142309eucas1p2b1277d96139eafc0d1dcc14145600476@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-02-09 14:22 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] dmaengine: pl330: Don't require irq-safe runtime PM Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-10 4:50 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-10 11:51 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-10 13:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-13 2:03 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-13 11:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-13 12:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-13 12:32 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-13 12:27 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-13 15:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-13 15:47 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-14 7:50 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2017-02-14 8:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-13 12:01 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-13 11:45 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-02-13 15:09 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea75ca9a-efc0-2d47-d6ef-fd32e675db49@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome