Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] vhost/vsock: add support for VHOST_RESET_OWNER and CPR migration

[Andrey Drobyshev <andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com>]

On 7/31/26 11:31 AM, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> On 7/31/26 2:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:45:37PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
>>> v5 -> v6:
>>>
>>>   * Patch 4:
>>>     - make sync+flush conditional by adding a bool 'sync' param to the
>>>       chain, as suggested by Michael:
>>>         vhost_dev_reset_owner()
>>>           vhost_dev_cleanup()
>>>             vhost_workers_free()
>>>
>>>     - reword commit message and comment;
>>>     - drop Fixes;
>>>
>>>   * Patch 5:
>>>     - add 'sync' param to vhost_dev_reset_owner() call.
>>>
>>> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260720102241.371610-1-andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com
>>
>> does not apply for me is this for net next?
>> in that case
>>
>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>
> 
> The series is based on tag v7.2-rc1.  However I think the reason it
> doesn't apply is you already have v5 of this series queued in
> mst/linux-next, commits ddb0918e36c4^..ad5b642c84d0, with your S-o-b.
> 
> So you might roll it back and take v6 instead (only commits 4 and 5
> differ), or leave v5 in the tree, or I can send you v5->v6 difference
> separately.  Whichever you prefer.

Friendly ping.

I noticed that these patches were queued in your linux-next tree, but
got dropped afterwards and never made it to your last PR (used to be
ddb0918e36c4^..ad5b642c84d0).  To be clear: the series targets your
vhost tree, not net-next tree.  Since it applies cleanly on your current
vhost branch - please let me know if it's ready or there's smth else
that should be fixed.

Thanks,
Andrey