From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756034AbcKVT4H (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:56:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wj0-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:32779 "EHLO mail-wj0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755309AbcKVT4G (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:56:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] drm: update MAINTAINERS for qemu drivers (bochs, cirrus, qxl, virtio-gpu) To: Eric Blake , Thomas Huth , Gerd Hoffmann , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <1479808693-30234-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <99e2e550-dad4-335f-e2d7-8a286863f57c@redhat.com> <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> Cc: open list From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:41:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/11/2016 19:54, Eric Blake wrote: >>> >> DRM DRIVER FOR BOCHS VIRTUAL GPU >>> >> M: Gerd Hoffmann >>> >> -S: Odd Fixes >>> >> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >> > >> > qemu-devel list already has very high traffic - not sure whether it >> > makes much sense to route even more additional patches here. Maybe >> > rather create a separate mailing list like qemu-graphics@nongnu.org ? > In practice, ALL patches should already be going to qemu-devel, even if > they are ALSO going to some other list. For example, qemu-block and > qemu-trivial are definitely cases where we have separate lists, but > where posters are reminded to include qemu-devel in cc if they want a > patch applied. The difference is that these would be kernel patches. Paolo