mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86/KVM: Do not allow DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT when LAPIC ARAT is not available
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:26:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaf03d34-a85a-7e54-31f4-fa85fce1901e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523438163-768-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de>

On 11/04/2018 11:16, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> If the processor does not have an "Always Running APIC Timer" (aka ARAT),
> we should not give guests direct access to MWAIT. The LAPIC timer would
> stop ticking in deep C-states, so any host deadlines would not wakeup the
> host kernel.
> 
> The host kernel intel_idle driver handles this by switching to broadcast
> mode when ARAT is not available and MWAIT is issued with a deep C-state
> that would stop the LAPIC timer. When MWAIT is passed through, we can not
> tell when MWAIT is issued.
> 
> So just disable this capability when LAPIC ARAT is not available. I am not
> even sure if there are any CPUs with VMX support but no LAPIC ARAT or not.

The alternative would be to remove ARAT from __do_cpuid_ent when the
host lacks it and userspace has requested direct access to MWAIT.
However, this is simpler.

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-11  9:16 KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-04-11  9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2018-04-11 14:02 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eaf03d34-a85a-7e54-31f4-fa85fce1901e@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®