From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1518DD266 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="JwsCzyxC"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="74SXa/MK" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1255F3200B30; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 04:26:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Jan 2024 04:26:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1704187560; x=1704273960; bh=ViLgRlnLWu ci24k/dFf7bBBJBPAedmBrtbXTtjEH0X0=; b=JwsCzyxClajDiO4m4iB52Av3uy c8eXztBEeTLkyvpN5mryM79Cgv21cJ4caGeW764iSBQbAN5AiohpjxpJYuZ6wJsa M5NccVn+G/0zw6YxGjESsnNU6FXT0DCJR7go2wEkAEpDw8lBVLjTHqqkBib+0xoh Q2BPMeTV317b1Dh538zJUQYAs+NzfGMcYZqyI0ablbyXwqO6me7/IvX+jlrqr92b Dh75kAY0vse3JON7m+8FYTkUlyudcr2QOlnCl3BYp69BPGEhKkKXAvBdFyttXAiz csjhsf+dPtF8/5gE0dwvEBAkkGupdysgo3SoPFDTrSa+W7miekedIqUwAveA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1704187560; x=1704273960; bh=ViLgRlnLWuci24k/dFf7bBBJBPAe dmBrtbXTtjEH0X0=; b=74SXa/MKxNy9XDyRnCdFhN9np/nleql+t3mEgFrNJ5Hq 9DSDiHpqtz8B0BUzizOFNqIUlUkfpH0+UfCu+Y7mHrMd0GQNIssPIrpYqdbtDoiT 0hbvn/6zoedjcrhX6/nlOrDdabHSxYpzzSD3/1LXFJKfRkZ/HMzPbp5SZpVOFqar WGErKihLl38OYRZVDFZ14o7Yo3JaBxv1oZwFIV6xzLcME7AWKLKeqn6uEjbrld6o HRup/C/vPydL9U3emXvhWVUdUOBqmNKojQehCgKXVaj/d4OqaGqAU5udsmHjtQCt ZhXE/01KDErD7J3LnC4nFJv+0/vHscTluMipbKst5w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdegvddgtddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffehueegteeihfegtefhjefgtdeugfegjeelheejueethfefgeeghfektdek teffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id C2FE9B6008D; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 04:25:59 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-1364-ga51d5fd3b7-fm-20231219.001-ga51d5fd3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20231218134532.50599-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <24e92cfc-8dc8-47b8-b379-ed8b1b776fba@app.fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:25:32 +0100 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm , soc@kernel.org, "Olof Johansson" Cc: "Lennert Buytenhek" , "Steve Sakoman" , "Mark F . Brown" , "Robert Jarzmik" , "Florian Fainelli" , "Simtec Linux Team" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: MAINTAINERS: drop empty entries for removed boards Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18/12/2023 15:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, at 13:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c and drivers/rtc/rtc-pxa.c >> are still in use. > > MMCI does not have maintainer. > > For the RTC, I guess the intention of 57f63bc8fe79 ("rtc: update > maintainership of pxa rtc driver") was to maintain the driver. > > The actual problem is that all of these entries (and R-321X below) come > from the times people were not putting any file paths to MAINTAINERS. > They stayed like this for 15-17 years, thus being effectively noop. > > Let's maybe wait till any of Cc-ed people respond and confirm they want > to grow the maintainer entry to cover the files? If they don't come, I > propose to remove them. Nobody else replied now, so for the moment, I applied a partial patch removing the EDB9315A, TS7250, TETON and CATS entries that are for files that were removed or are in the process. For the other ones, I would still prefer to just list the files. Arnd