mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: oneukum@suse.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: clear port_remote_wakeup after resume failure
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:16:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb5d9252-1283-be73-96d6-c24a0fdf1eab@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524145231.6605-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

On 24.5.2019 17.52, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> This was seen on a Dell Precision 5520 using it's WD15 dock. The dock's
> Ethernet device interfaces with the laptop through one of it's USB3
> ports. While idle, the Ethernet device and HCD are suspended by runtime
> PM, being the only device connected on the bus. Then, both are resumed on
> behalf of the Ethernet device, which has remote wake-up capabilities.
> 
> The Ethernet device was observed to randomly disconnect from the USB
> port shortly after submitting it's remote wake-up request. Probably a
> weird timing issue yet to be investigated. This causes runtime PM to
> busyloop causing some tangible CPU load. The reason is the port gets
> stuck in the middle of a remote wake-up operation, waiting for the
> device to switch to U0. This never happens, leaving "port_remote_wakeup"
> enabled, and automatically triggering a failure on any further suspend
> operation.
> 
> This patch clears "port_remote_wakeup" upon detecting a device with a
> wrong resuming port state (see Table 4-9 in 4.15.2.3). Making sure the
> above mentioned situation doesn't trigger a PM busyloop.
> 

There was a similar case where the USB3 link had transitioned to a
lower power U1 or U2 state after resume, before driver read the state,
leaving port_remote_wakeup flag uncleared.

This was fixed in 5.1 kernel by commit:

6cbcf59 xhci: Fix port resume done detection for SS ports with LPM enable

Can you check if you have it?
It should be in recent stable releases as well.

-Mathias

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-27 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24 14:52 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-05-27 11:16 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2019-05-27 11:28   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-04 13:53     ` Mathias Nyman
2019-06-08 13:33       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb5d9252-1283-be73-96d6-c24a0fdf1eab@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®