From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: oneukum@suse.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: clear port_remote_wakeup after resume failure
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:16:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb5d9252-1283-be73-96d6-c24a0fdf1eab@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524145231.6605-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
On 24.5.2019 17.52, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> This was seen on a Dell Precision 5520 using it's WD15 dock. The dock's
> Ethernet device interfaces with the laptop through one of it's USB3
> ports. While idle, the Ethernet device and HCD are suspended by runtime
> PM, being the only device connected on the bus. Then, both are resumed on
> behalf of the Ethernet device, which has remote wake-up capabilities.
>
> The Ethernet device was observed to randomly disconnect from the USB
> port shortly after submitting it's remote wake-up request. Probably a
> weird timing issue yet to be investigated. This causes runtime PM to
> busyloop causing some tangible CPU load. The reason is the port gets
> stuck in the middle of a remote wake-up operation, waiting for the
> device to switch to U0. This never happens, leaving "port_remote_wakeup"
> enabled, and automatically triggering a failure on any further suspend
> operation.
>
> This patch clears "port_remote_wakeup" upon detecting a device with a
> wrong resuming port state (see Table 4-9 in 4.15.2.3). Making sure the
> above mentioned situation doesn't trigger a PM busyloop.
>
There was a similar case where the USB3 link had transitioned to a
lower power U1 or U2 state after resume, before driver read the state,
leaving port_remote_wakeup flag uncleared.
This was fixed in 5.1 kernel by commit:
6cbcf59 xhci: Fix port resume done detection for SS ports with LPM enable
Can you check if you have it?
It should be in recent stable releases as well.
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-27 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 14:52 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-05-27 11:16 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2019-05-27 11:28 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-04 13:53 ` Mathias Nyman
2019-06-08 13:33 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb5d9252-1283-be73-96d6-c24a0fdf1eab@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®