mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>,
	Philip Chen <philipchen@chromium.org>,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/panel-edp: Take advantage of wait_hpd_asserted() in struct drm_dp_aux
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 18:12:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb66c55c-cecb-0af0-8800-0a9e59d67a9b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418101725.v3.2.Icea616f57331fbaa3d48c529f300c9a8ebd37fb5@changeid>

On 18/04/2022 20:17, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Let's add support for being able to read the HPD pin even if it's
> hooked directly to the controller. This will allow us to get more
> accurate delays also lets us take away the waiting in the AUX transfer
> functions of the eDP controller drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

> ---
> 
> (no changes since v2)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Change is_hpd_asserted() to wait_hpd_asserted()
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> index 1732b4f56e38..086e0bf52fb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> @@ -417,6 +417,11 @@ static int panel_edp_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev, struct panel_edp *p)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static bool panel_edp_can_read_hpd(struct panel_edp *p)
> +{
> +	return !p->no_hpd && (p->hpd_gpio || (p->aux && p->aux->wait_hpd_asserted));
> +}
> +
>   static int panel_edp_prepare_once(struct panel_edp *p)
>   {
>   	struct device *dev = p->base.dev;
> @@ -441,17 +446,21 @@ static int panel_edp_prepare_once(struct panel_edp *p)
>   	if (delay)
>   		msleep(delay);
>   
> -	if (p->hpd_gpio) {
> +	if (panel_edp_can_read_hpd(p)) {
>   		if (p->desc->delay.hpd_absent)
>   			hpd_wait_us = p->desc->delay.hpd_absent * 1000UL;
>   		else
>   			hpd_wait_us = 2000000;
>   
> -		err = readx_poll_timeout(gpiod_get_value_cansleep, p->hpd_gpio,
> -					 hpd_asserted, hpd_asserted,
> -					 1000, hpd_wait_us);
> -		if (hpd_asserted < 0)
> -			err = hpd_asserted;
> +		if (p->hpd_gpio) {
> +			err = readx_poll_timeout(gpiod_get_value_cansleep,
> +						 p->hpd_gpio, hpd_asserted,
> +						 hpd_asserted, 1000, hpd_wait_us);
> +			if (hpd_asserted < 0)
> +				err = hpd_asserted;
> +		} else {
> +			err = p->aux->wait_hpd_asserted(p->aux, hpd_wait_us);
> +		}

I'm close to thinking that this construct deserves a separate helper.

>   
>   		if (err) {
>   			if (err != -ETIMEDOUT)
> @@ -532,18 +541,22 @@ static int panel_edp_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	/*
>   	 * If there is a "prepare_to_enable" delay then that's supposed to be
>   	 * the delay from HPD going high until we can turn the backlight on.
> -	 * However, we can only count this if HPD is handled by the panel
> -	 * driver, not if it goes to a dedicated pin on the controller.
> +	 * However, we can only count this if HPD is readable by the panel
> +	 * driver.
> +	 *
>   	 * If we aren't handling the HPD pin ourselves then the best we
>   	 * can do is assume that HPD went high immediately before we were
> -	 * called (and link training took zero time).
> +	 * called (and link training took zero time). Note that "no-hpd"
> +	 * actually counts as handling HPD ourselves since we're doing the
> +	 * worst case delay (in prepare) ourselves.
>   	 *
>   	 * NOTE: if we ever end up in this "if" statement then we're
>   	 * guaranteed that the panel_edp_wait() call below will do no delay.
>   	 * It already handles that case, though, so we don't need any special
>   	 * code for it.
>   	 */
> -	if (p->desc->delay.prepare_to_enable && !p->hpd_gpio && !p->no_hpd)
> +	if (p->desc->delay.prepare_to_enable &&
> +	    !panel_edp_can_read_hpd(p) && !p->no_hpd)
>   		delay = max(delay, p->desc->delay.prepare_to_enable);
>   
>   	if (delay)


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-02 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 17:17 [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/dp: Introduce wait_hpd_asserted() for the DP AUX bus Douglas Anderson
2022-04-18 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/dp: Add wait_hpd_asserted() callback to struct drm_dp_aux Douglas Anderson
2022-05-12  1:58   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-12 23:24     ` Doug Anderson
2022-05-20  0:34       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-20 15:45         ` Doug Anderson
2022-06-02 10:22   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-18 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/panel-edp: Take advantage of wait_hpd_asserted() in " Douglas Anderson
2022-06-02 15:12   ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-06-14 21:57     ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-18 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/panel: atna33xc20: " Douglas Anderson
2022-06-02 14:49   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-18 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Provide " Douglas Anderson
2022-06-02 14:56   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 23:26 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/dp: Introduce wait_hpd_asserted() for the DP AUX bus Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb66c55c-cecb-0af0-8800-0a9e59d67a9b@linaro.org \
    --to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philipchen@chromium.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®