From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>
To: Yang Wen <anmuxixixi@gmail.com>,
linkinjeon@kernel.org, sj1557.seo@samsung.com,
yuezhang.mo@sony.com
Cc: exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] exfat: speed up file creation in large directories
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:41:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb75911d-30cb-4271-aeee-4a629df8e8c5@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902152455.1273557-1-anmuxixixi@gmail.com>
On 9/2/26 11:24 PM, Yang Wen wrote:
> Negative name lookups and empty-entry allocation can repeatedly scan a
> directory from the beginning. Bulk creation in a large directory therefore
> approaches O(N^2).
>
> This series separates the optimization into three independently reviewable
> steps. Patch 1 adds the Bloom filter used to reject definite name misses.
> Patch 2 retains and correctly invalidates the next-empty-entry hint. Patch 3
> adds the LRU and shrinker used to reclaim filters under memory pressure.
>
> Test environment:
> QEMU TCG multi-thread, 4 vCPUs, 6 GiB RAM
> 4 GiB exFAT image, 32 KiB clusters
>
> Creating 20,000 empty files improved from 589.48 seconds to 5.33 seconds,
> which is a 110.6-fold speedup.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Split the change into Bloom filter, empty-entry hint, and shrinker patches.
> - Accept filenames containing exactly 255 UTF-16 code units while building
> the Bloom filter.
> - Invalidate the empty-entry hint in every path that can free directory
> entries, preventing stale hints from skipping earlier holes.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Move exfat_name_filter_free() to exfat_evict_inode() because
> ->free_inode() may run from an RCU callback in softirq context.
>
> Yang Wen (3):
> exfat: add a Bloom filter for negative name lookups
> exfat: retain the next empty directory entry hint
> exfat: reclaim name filters under memory pressure
>
> fs/exfat/dir.c | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 23 ++++
> fs/exfat/inode.c | 1 +
> fs/exfat/namei.c | 58 ++++++++-
> fs/exfat/super.c | 9 ++
> 5 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
This is a much better version than v2.
Reviewed-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 15:24 Yang Wen
2026-09-02 15:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] exfat: add a Bloom filter for negative name lookups Yang Wen
2026-10-19 0:27 ` NeilBrown
2026-09-02 15:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] exfat: retain the next empty directory entry hint Yang Wen
2026-09-11 0:02 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-09-02 15:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] exfat: reclaim name filters under memory pressure Yang Wen
2026-09-03 8:41 ` Chi Zhiling [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb75911d-30cb-4271-aeee-4a629df8e8c5@163.com \
--to=chizhiling@163.com \
--cc=anmuxixixi@gmail.com \
--cc=exfat@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®