From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E87085626; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 13:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.159 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751636213; cv=none; b=W0HqVGnvh/ROJvtmZUcABtlJOMIeqQQSu/OPC9F4Zji6dW5tNainbrZeaCjSWpX0PBQp//d/xU97Tn+B4nNHuGH285AA7XWVr5hYYcklu7sZi3FiZOU9SPUSTtUYRDqWwW/5vj7d8ZEYpUuhEbKCEliL8ijrZmyhWVG9vmTwQT8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751636213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q9UkrFl51j4x9O2AKzGaYg7j7Qe2rlKFHMgNrDtlZaQ=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=CT++2CRXxRTgyuXuNiy323Yn/k5rnGlK9BbqqxqIysoudIqEKe/9MGFgWkH5nxZWNXHhN5jGoRGk7BNsvo3pjaMXLnXmy00tQDkgGHj3DP7dnVa1UatmXxKXdhTKhTSGo47gMlgy2iN8Nrpj4bD2sp2QSYLuEaX/nrM6Ru5x8OE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=Ierk354A; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=MvfGxD45; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.159 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="Ierk354A"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="MvfGxD45" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7311400239; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 09:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-02 ([10.202.2.81]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Jul 2025 09:36:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1751636210; x=1751722610; bh=4WAwqvw8g3t1MUCHlAIadPbHEDivdqOU5oF5ZelV4ww=; b= Ierk354AvF659FFpEBGZTnHYIKg5Cftf2qg+x1+moeY0eQH0V5tIDArd0R1asTWH 3Ph/Zhxo4uqzR23mbt1uqpOiQFdzI4DmS2+a7Lj3VE8+rNZgSe6195p1FXRNKvT3 dDttZYTVyarpE7xl5fG3tnObnDl3IJZu5qn2B8wuYvLUwD4BQRazzHfETlb1e7zr C/OIPEWYQNN1ZB+Un9zrdBdTZrZcx7r0loYfP3TGNZPfTdRuZUoAbeI6HhxOYX1e 9laI7rCkUK0SZI4cF9RKRtwO3HpZrdx2qh/m2P6L4wbIfHRWuxhppW0A2/n7bq7H 0h2eHRd8WRBgoPKvpdKYpA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1751636210; x= 1751722610; bh=4WAwqvw8g3t1MUCHlAIadPbHEDivdqOU5oF5ZelV4ww=; b=M vfGxD45kzCPWcC1qgDw6pQLWiTjnNSo9fflkxfhmwu00u4MLErLDWnnQdkbMYPUO ep7W9iUaPExx49n1CZGeWZnp4dSbkablwgofEldRzt8PObUUAaBB4SJROM3EZDQs EeeQ3KSgbi+98NIXPg1nrjaYrS0bGMNrVeRtAhEQV0JVzlOXJs/DjBIidzK6tgEm CyDVMHynVKycn07PBvZo63tH2bvSK3xQuPpyCkgFaNQNyu7fXHuWxo364m00Cqja L2uRNuo1C38lM/eKZ5mJskKA7Ym+q2lR6M15+cb7BgUDN4Nls3Sdzw1BRjuPdaE/ SwPLNckhUFyNtlbdWSsMg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgddvfedvlecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefoggffhffvvefkjghfufgtgfesthejredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepfdetrhhnugcu uegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrh hnpefhtdfhvddtfeehudekteeggffghfejgeegteefgffgvedugeduveelvdekhfdvieen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrrhhnug esrghrnhgusgdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedujedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht pdhrtghpthhtohepsggvnhejudejsegrnhguvghsthgvtghhrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epthhimheitdelsegrnhguvghsthgvtghhrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphhrrggshhgr khgrrhdrmhgrhhgruggvvhdqlhgrugdrrhhjsegsphdrrhgvnhgvshgrshdrtghomhdprh gtphhtthhopehprghlmhgvrhesuggrsggsvghlthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrohhu segvvggtshdrsggvrhhkvghlvgihrdgvughupdhrtghpthhtoheprghlvgigsehghhhith hirdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopegtohhnohhrodgutheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghp thhtohepkhhriihkodgutheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhriihkse hkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id F2AFD700065; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 09:36:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: T286e4b5afb74591b Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 15:36:17 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Ben Zong-You Xie" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" Cc: "Paul Walmsley" , "Palmer Dabbelt" , "Albert Ou" , "Alexandre Ghiti" , "Rob Herring" , krzk+dt@kernel.org, "Conor Dooley" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Daniel Lezcano" , "Lad, Prabhakar" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, soc@lists.linux.dev, tim609@andestech.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20250704081451.2011407-1-ben717@andestech.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] add Voyager board support Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Jul 4, 2025, at 15:07, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> > Also, there is a patch dependency in this patchset: >> > Patch 2 <- Patch 4 <- Patch 5 <- Patch 6 >> >> How? These are bindings. How DTS can depend on the binding? Do you have >> akcs from their subsystem maintainers that you are sending it here? >> >> Sorry, but no, this should go via their maintainers, unless they did not >> want to pick it up. Is this the case here? > > The dependency chain arises because each of these patches introduces a new file, > requiring a corresponding update to the MAINTAINERS file. > > In v4 [1], Rob and Daniel attempted to merge Patch 4 and Patch 5, respectively, > but encountered conflicts in the MAINTAINERS file. That's why I specified the > patch dependencies in v5 and this patchset. > > Now, I understand that binding patches are typically handled by subsystem > maintainers. To prevent the conflicts again, I think I should gather all > MAINTAINERS file changes into a single patch. Is that right? Don't overthink that part, the MAINTAINERS file doesn't have to cleanly bisect, so I'd just create the full entry there in the same patch that adds the arch/riscv/Kconfig entry. Arnd