mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yaroslav <iam@0la.ch>
To: "Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Yaroslav Bolyukin" <iam@lach.pw>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	"Rodrigo Siqueira" <siqueira@igalia.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Wayne Lin" <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/edid: prepare for VESA vendor-specific data block extension
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 15:50:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebd974b5-88f4-4fb3-a135-bad3bf7d9b4d@0la.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7191ab7c3030a8be0b149d28ae6fa032b64a4d8@intel.com>



On 2025-11-26 15:08, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Yaroslav Bolyukin <iam@lach.pw> wrote:
>>> Current VESA vendor-specific block parsing expects real block size to be
>>> the same as the defined struct size, use real offsets in conditionals
>>> instead to add struct fields in future commits.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Bolyukin <iam@lach.pw>
>>
>> I think this is something we want to backport, since MSO would break
>> with bigger vendor-specific blocks, and that leads to black screens on
>> MSO displays.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> 
> Oops, I'll take that back.
> 
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>>> index 64f7a94dd9e4..a52fd6de9327 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>>> @@ -6544,7 +6544,7 @@ static void drm_parse_vesa_specific_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>   	if (oui(vesa->oui[0], vesa->oui[1], vesa->oui[2]) != VESA_IEEE_OUI)
>>>   		return;
>>>   
>>> -	if (sizeof(*vesa) != sizeof(*block) + block->num_bytes) {
>>> +	if (block->num_bytes < 5) {
>>>   		drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>>>   			    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Unexpected VESA vendor block size\n",
>>>   			    connector->base.id, connector->name);
>>> @@ -6567,24 +6567,20 @@ static void drm_parse_vesa_specific_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>   		break;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> -	if (!info->mso_stream_count) {
>>> -		info->mso_pixel_overlap = 0;
> 
> This is no longer cleared for !info->mso_stream_count.
> 
> Perhaps the code could be reorganized to handle it better.

It defaults to zero due to drm_reset_display_info()

>>> -		return;
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -	info->mso_pixel_overlap = FIELD_GET(DISPLAYID_VESA_MSO_OVERLAP, vesa->mso);
>>> -	if (info->mso_pixel_overlap > 8) {
>>> +	if (info->mso_stream_count) {
>>> +		info->mso_pixel_overlap = FIELD_GET(DISPLAYID_VESA_MSO_OVERLAP, vesa->mso);
>>> +		if (info->mso_pixel_overlap > 8) {
>>> +			drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>>> +				    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Reserved MSO pixel overlap value %u\n",
>>> +				    connector->base.id, connector->name,
>>> +				    info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>>> +			info->mso_pixel_overlap = 8;
>>> +		}
>>>   		drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>>> -			    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Reserved MSO pixel overlap value %u\n",
>>> +			    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] MSO stream count %u, pixel overlap %u\n",
>>>   			    connector->base.id, connector->name,
>>> -			    info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>>> -		info->mso_pixel_overlap = 8;
>>> +			    info->mso_stream_count, info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>>>   	}
>>> -
>>> -	drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>>> -		    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] MSO stream count %u, pixel overlap %u\n",
>>> -		    connector->base.id, connector->name,
>>> -		    info->mso_stream_count, info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   static void drm_update_vesa_specific_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-26 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-26  6:51 [PATCH v6 0/7] VESA DisplayID spec allows the device to force its DSC bits per pixel value Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/edid: rename VESA block parsing functions to more generic name Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26  9:05   ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/edid: prepare for VESA vendor-specific data block extension Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26  9:13   ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:08     ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:50       ` Yaroslav [this message]
2025-11-26 14:59         ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 15:06           ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 15:26             ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 16:32               ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:20     ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:29       ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:41         ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:47           ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:53             ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/edid: MSO should only be used for non-eDP displays Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:10   ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:22     ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/edid: parse DSC DPP passthru support flag for mode VII timings Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:19   ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:35     ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:52       ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/edid: for consistency, use mask everywhere for block rev parsing Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:20   ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/edid: parse DRM VESA dsc bpp target Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:25   ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26  6:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/amd: use fixed dsc bits-per-pixel from edid Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26  7:13 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] VESA DisplayID spec allows the device to force its DSC bits per pixel value Yaroslav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebd974b5-88f4-4fb3-a135-bad3bf7d9b4d@0la.ch \
    --to=iam@0la.ch \
    --cc=Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=iam@lach.pw \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
    --cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®