From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Disable kexec for TDX guests
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 09:25:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebead33b-0594-73df-56ae-f40473ac0ffc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325160128.21857-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
On 3/25/23 09:01, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> The last item is tricky. TDX guests use ACPI MADT MPWK to bring up
> secondary CPUs. The mechanism doesn't allow to put a CPU back offline if
> it has woken up.
...
> +int arch_kexec_load(void)
> +{
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST)) {
> + pr_warn_once("Disable kexec: not yet supported in TDX guest\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
So, let's put all this together:
1. TDX implementations use MADT for wakeup exclusively right now (but
are not necessarily _required_ to do so forever)
2. MADT doesn't support CPU offlining
3. kexec() requires offlining
Thus, current TDX implementations can't support TDX guests. This
*doesn't* say that TDX will always use the MADT for wakeups.
Yet, the check you have here is for TDX and *not* for the MADT.
That seems wrong.
Let's say SEV or arm64 comes along and uses the MADT for their guests.
They'll add another arch_kexec_load(), with a check for *their* feature.
This all seems like you should be disabling kexec() the moment the MADT
CPU wakeup is used instead of making it based on TDX.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 16:01 Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-25 16:20 ` Dave Hansen
2023-03-25 16:25 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2023-03-25 19:25 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-26 17:01 ` Dave Hansen
2023-03-27 1:35 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-27 11:09 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-28 4:25 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-27 10:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebead33b-0594-73df-56ae-f40473ac0ffc@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®