From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D34116DEC9 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720723892; cv=none; b=IXUbj3SCCfZs9iNXz9xiVr8X/6MLZ2dX6IeKiTIcorWBQ3qFG01xLFN3Zzc7bgkIa2luexrDd9CgMy2R33KunyC2TRSd+iLK65YndYVRavnCynle4SB/oAlobmnkdRhoLceCeQ4/eV2KVB1XR3D3jPxjx4qFjKZ444otG41UiRM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720723892; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GbVV3xtyV+YHsn6PR2MxtBSTwiFfW2plyd+t2FmGEs0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Zv0DWDllZVhHvA81Ug2m7dWHLTWkTrKXiSp0kp8xKhaHKrRljDR9xsYFzrts5bXcINakvQk07Q1TYKBco9q3dnc0y/9s27azQlkBWEUCKCIizjciTgegFwC9EmUz4DLViho+uP6p+fLNcQ/dKxufzC+i/epxY89J5X6CeX8CjFg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=aM+JIVu/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="aM+JIVu/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1720723890; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZuNkKNqv9pZLBGUFjsKQZGxQRVrivTuf741mq7BYdgk=; b=aM+JIVu/kQuPRe3XuWdEIMUNiB7sup3h6rpiFE65p44bQ0kfmBJ4FiWLFIG95Nrf6pWRIl lSo+Ck6lorTaSKZ8hAnStkoYrpv1lG6gHis2r9UoptRt3sCrHz73cd9f8Wclng+MEoeTPo 3IV8+JR955rqghNZJUGyheClOoNyUTM= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-612-wdVIOE8_NfOMjSY0DG08nA-1; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:51:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wdVIOE8_NfOMjSY0DG08nA-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331B31955F56; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from file1-rdu.file-001.prod.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (unknown [10.11.5.21]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C377A19560AA; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by file1-rdu.file-001.prod.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 12668) id 1497330C1C19; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by file1-rdu.file-001.prod.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110B03FB48; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:51:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:51:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikulas Patocka To: Mike Snitzer cc: Stephen Rothwell , Jens Axboe , Alasdair G Kergon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the device-mapper tree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20240711121729.0d71308e@canb.auug.org.au> <947e6d6b-f798-4f04-b6d7-d18ad550db66@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 On Thu, 11 Jul 2024, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Looks like the dm tree is re-applying patches yesterday rather > > than pulling in the dependency? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-6.11&id=e87621ac68fec9086d9f0af4fe96594dd8e07fbb > > > > why? > > Really good question. > > Mikulas has been handling DM for the 6.11 development cycle. But I've > helped answer question and such along the way. We actually had a > meeting on Tuesday to discuss outstanding patches (in patchwork) and > specifically discussed this very patch. At the time I said I would > get with you to make sure you were the one to pick up Damien's 5 > patches (which included what is now commit e87621ac68fe in block). I > specifically said that the entire series should go through block > because even if DM picked up the one "dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()" > it'd cause problems because block would then depend on DM for a simple > prep commit needed for later a patch in series. I probably badly understood it, I added the patch to my notes and then I thought that I should apply it. Sorry for that. Mikulas > Anyway, I later saw you had already picked up Damien's series and had > no need to reach out to you, I noted as much to a group chat at Red > Hat (Mikulas included). So not really sure what happened. > > Sorry for the noise/trouble. > > Mike >