mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>, paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Add per-CPU rcuc task info to RCU CPU stall warnings
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:03:58 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec15ce1f-4766-6ccc-97d2-980c8ea183a7@gnuweeb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124103637.4001386-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

Hi Zqiang,

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 02:30:00 +0800, Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
```
 > +static void rcuc_kthread_dump(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 > +{
 > +        int cpu;
 > +        unsigned long j;
 > +        struct task_struct *rcuc = rdp->rcu_cpu_kthread_task;
 > +
 > +        if (rcu_is_rcuc_kthread_starving(rdp, &j)) {
 > +                cpu = rcuc ? task_cpu(rcuc) : -1;
 > +
 > +                if (rcuc) {
 > +                        pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies, stack dump:\n",
 > + rcuc->comm, j);
 > +                        sched_show_task(rcuc);
 > +                        if (cpu >= 0) {
 > +                                if (cpu_online(cpu) && !idle_cpu(cpu)) {
 > +                                        pr_err("Dump current CPU stack:\n");
 > +                                        if (!trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(cpu))
 > + dump_cpu_task(cpu);
 > +                                }
 > +                        }
 > +                }
 > +        }
 > +}
```

1) We can reduce the nested if with an early return
    after checking `rcu_is_rcuc_kthread_starving()`.

2) This ternary operator doesn't make sense:

   `cpu = rcuc ? task_cpu(rcuc) : -1;`

If `rcuc` is NULL, then the "if (rcuc)" block will never
be executed, and `cpu` variable won't be used, why should
we perform a conditional with ternary to assign -1 here?

3) We can use an early return as well for the `if (rcuc)` to
    avoid more nested if.


FWIW, this one makes more sense:
```
static void rcuc_kthread_dump(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
     int cpu;
     unsigned long j;
     struct task_struct *rcuc;

     if (!rcu_is_rcuc_kthread_starving(rdp, &j))
         return;

     rcuc = rdp->rcu_cpu_kthread_task;
     if (!rcuc)
         return;

     pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies, stack dump:\n", rcuc->comm, j);
     sched_show_task(rcuc);
     cpu = task_cpu(rcuc);
     if (cpu_online(cpu) && !idle_cpu(cpu)) {
         pr_err("Dump current CPU stack:\n");
         if (!trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(cpu))
             dump_cpu_task(cpu);
     }
}
```

Thank you!

-- 
Ammar Faizi


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-24 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-24 10:36 Zqiang
2022-01-24 10:03 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2022-01-24 10:38 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-01-24 16:42   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-24 22:08     ` Ammar Faizi
2022-01-25  2:24       ` Zhang, Qiang1

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ec15ce1f-4766-6ccc-97d2-980c8ea183a7@gnuweeb.org \
    --to=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®