From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Change PMCR write to read-modify-write
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:31:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec1bda5b-9068-56a7-3ed0-9a606036d60a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2e82eca3dec9d1ea9053e9e69223db3@codeaurora.org>
On 21/03/2019 20:02, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
> On 2019-03-21 06:34, Julien Thierry wrote:
>> Hi Prasad,
>>
>> On 21/03/2019 02:07, Prasad Sodagudi wrote:
>>> Preserves the bitfields of PMCR_EL0(AArch64) during PMU reset.
>>> Reset routine should write a 1 to PMCR.C and PMCR.P fields only
>>> to reset the counters. Other fields should not be changed
>>> as they could be set before PMU initialization and their
>>> value must be preserved even after reset.
>>>
>>
>> Are there any particular bit you are concerned about? Apart from the RO
>> ones and the Res0 ones (to which we are already writing 0), I see:
>>
>> DP -> irrelevant for non-secure
>> X -> This one is the only potentially interesting, however it resets to
>> an architecturally unknown value, so unless we know for a fact it was
>> set before hand, we probably want to clear it
>> D -> ignored when we have LC set (and we do)
>> E -> Since this is the function we use to reset the PMU on the current
>> CPU, we probably want to set this bit to 0 regardless of its previous
>> value
>>
>> So, is there any issue this patch is solving?
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> Thanks for taking a look into this patch. Yes. On our Qualcomm
> platforms, observed that X bit is getting cleared by kernel.
> This bit is getting set by firmware for Qualcomm use cases and
> non-secure world is resetting without this patch.
> I think, changing that register this register modifications to
> read-modify-write style make sense.
>
Maybe for the X bit, but for the E bit this seems like the wrong thing
to do. We want to set the E bit to 0 here.
And for platforms that don't have a firmware touching the X bit (or
rather the pmcr as a whole), I'd like to understand whether it would be
valid to leave this bit set to an architecturally unknown value and
preserving that value.
Thanks,
>>> Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>>> b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>>> index 4addb38..0c1afdd 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>>> @@ -868,8 +868,8 @@ static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
>>> * Initialize & Reset PMNC. Request overflow interrupt for
>>> * 64 bit cycle counter but cheat in armv8pmu_write_counter().
>>> */
>>> - armv8pmu_pmcr_write(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C |
>>> - ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
>>> + armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P |
>>> + ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int __armv8_pmuv3_map_event(struct perf_event *event,
>>>
>
--
Julien Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 2:07 Prasad Sodagudi
2019-03-21 13:34 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-21 20:02 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2019-03-22 8:31 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2019-04-01 8:17 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-02 16:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec1bda5b-9068-56a7-3ed0-9a606036d60a@arm.com \
--to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®