From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: sw.prabhu6@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mcgrof@kernel.org, kernel@pankajraghav.com
Subject: Re: [v1 0/2] enable sector size > PAGE_SIZE for scsi
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:56:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec5f42bd-a26a-4416-b967-f67090e9a423@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210014136.2549405-1-sw.prabhu6@gmail.com>
On 2025/12/09 17:41, sw.prabhu6@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Swarna Prabhu <sw.prabhu6@gmail.com>
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is non RFC v1 series sent based on the feedback received on RFC
> v2 [1] and RFC v1 [2]. This patchset enables sector sizes > PAGE_SIZE for
> sd driver and scsi_debug driver since block layer can support block
> size > PAGE_SIZE. There was one issue with write_same16 and write_same10
> command, which is fixed as a part of the series.
>
> Motivation:
> - While enabling LBS on ZoneFS, zonefs-tools tests were being skipped
> for conventional zones when tested on nvme block device emulated using
> QEMU. Hence there was a need to enable scsi with higher sector sizes
> to run zonefs tests for conventional zones as well.
This is super confusing: there are no conventional zones with NVMe. And why
would a problem with NVMe require scsi patches ?
> Changes since RFC v2:
> - Replaced open coded check for enabling sdebug_sector_size > PAGE_SIZE
> with blk_validate_block_size() in scsi_debug.
> - Replaced open coded check for enabling sector_size > PAGE_SIZE
> with blk_validate_block_size() in sd driver.
> - Replaced 'struct request *rq' argument in 'sd_set_special_bvec()' to
> 'struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd' and used that to get SCSI device pointer
> 'struct scsi_device *sdp'.
> - Slightly modified the commit title for scsi sd driver fix patch.
> - Added "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag to scsi sd driver fix patch.
>
> Changes since RFC v1:
> - Re organized the patch series into one patch for scsi_debug driver
> and one patch for sd driver.
> - Updated commit title and description to accommodate the above
> re organization on commit titled - scsi: sd: fix write_same(16/10)
> to enable sector size > PAGE_SIZE.
> - Updated commit title and description to reflect the re organization
> on commit titled - scsi: scsi_debug: enable sdebug_sector_size
> > PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Thanks to Bart for feedback on the RFC v1 and v2 series.
>
> Testing:
> -Test suite: xfs and generic from fstest + QEMU emulated block
> device(scsi and nvme)
> - fstest Config for patched xfs 16k block size [xfs_reflink_16k_scsi]
> TEST_DEV=/dev/sda
> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb"
> MKFS_OPTIONS='-f -m reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i sparse=1, -b size=16384,
> -s size=16384'
> - Generic test results
> Baseline: 6.18.0-rc7 kernel + nvme 16k logical block size
> Patched: 6.18 kernel + scsi 16k logical block size
> 5 failures seen on generic tests and the same seen on baseline
> No regressions introduced by the patch.
> - XFS tests results
> Baseline: 6.18.0-rc7 kernel + nvme16k logical block size
> Patched: 6.18 kernel + sci 16k logical block size
> 30 failures seen on patched and baseline
> No regressions introduced by the patch
> - Blktests results
> scis and block layer tests with 16k and 32k logical block size.
> config used:
> TEST_DEVS=(/dev/sda)
> EXCLUDE=(block/010 block/011) # these didn't run on baseline(nvme 16k)
> All tests passed.
>
> Link to RFC v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251203230546.1275683-2-sw.prabhu6@gmail.com/ [1]
> Link to RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251202021522.188419-1-sw.prabhu6@gmail.com/ [2]
>
> Swarna Prabhu (2):
> scsi: sd: fix write_same(16/10) to enable sector size > PAGE_SIZE
> scsi: scsi_debug: enable sdebug_sector_size > PAGE_SIZE
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 8 +-------
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 1:41 sw.prabhu6
2025-12-10 1:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: sd: fix write_same(16/10) to enable sector size > PAGE_SIZE sw.prabhu6
2025-12-10 1:52 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-11 23:53 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-12-13 3:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-10 1:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: scsi_debug: enable sdebug_sector_size " sw.prabhu6
2025-12-10 1:56 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-12-12 0:18 ` [v1 0/2] enable sector size > PAGE_SIZE for scsi Swarna Prabhu
2025-12-13 3:22 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec5f42bd-a26a-4416-b967-f67090e9a423@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sw.prabhu6@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®