mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/31] x86/resctrl: Change generic monitor functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 20:38:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec7c62cc-61a1-42e5-a6b1-066fe7894611@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429003359.375508-11-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

On 4/28/25 5:33 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Functions that don't need the internal details of the rdt_mon_domain
> can operate on just the rdt_domain_hdr.

Please add a bit more detail in the context:
"just the rdt_domain_hdr" -> "just the rdt_domain_hdr within" or "just rdt_mon_domain::rdt_domain_hdr".

> 
> Add sanity checks where container_of() is used to find the surrounding
> domain structure that hdr has the expected type.

How is reader expected to interpret "hdr"?

> 
> Simplify code that uses "d->hdr." to "hdr->" where possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/resctrl.h            |  4 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 19 +++----
>  fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c              | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index e700f58b5af5..bb55c449adc4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -444,9 +444,9 @@ int resctrl_arch_update_one(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d,
>  u32 resctrl_arch_get_config(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d,
>  			    u32 closid, enum resctrl_conf_type type);
>  int resctrl_online_ctrl_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d);
> -int resctrl_online_mon_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d);
> +int resctrl_online_mon_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr);
>  void resctrl_offline_ctrl_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d);
> -void resctrl_offline_mon_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d);
> +void resctrl_offline_mon_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr);
>  void resctrl_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>  void resctrl_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 525439029865..9c78828ae32f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static void domain_add_cpu_ctrl(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  			return;
>  		d = container_of(hdr, struct rdt_ctrl_domain, hdr);

Is the above container_of() still needed?

>  
> -		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask);
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
>  		if (r->cache.arch_has_per_cpu_cfg)
>  			rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(r);
>  		return;
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void setup_l3_mon_domain(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resource *r, struct
>  
>  	list_add_tail_rcu(&d->hdr.list, add_pos);
>  
> -	err = resctrl_online_mon_domain(r, d);
> +	err = resctrl_online_mon_domain(r, &d->hdr);
>  	if (err) {
>  		list_del_rcu(&d->hdr.list);
>  		synchronize_rcu();
> @@ -537,7 +537,6 @@ static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  	int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->mon_scope);
>  	struct list_head *add_pos = NULL;
>  	struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr;
> -	struct rdt_mon_domain *d;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&domain_list_lock);
>  
> @@ -549,11 +548,7 @@ static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  
>  	hdr = resctrl_find_domain(&r->mon_domains, id, &add_pos);
>  	if (hdr) {
> -		if (check_domain_header(hdr, RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN, r->rid))
> -			return;
> -		d = container_of(hdr, struct rdt_mon_domain, hdr);
> -
> -		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask);

It is not clear to me why changes to domain_add_cpu_ctrl() and domain_add_cpu_mon()
do not match in this regard.

> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -603,9 +598,9 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu_ctrl(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  	hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_ctrl_dom(d);
>  
>  	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask);

Above also seems to be candidate for the intended simplification?

> -	if (cpumask_empty(&d->hdr.cpu_mask)) {
> +	if (cpumask_empty(&hdr->cpu_mask)) {
>  		resctrl_offline_ctrl_domain(r, d);
> -		list_del_rcu(&d->hdr.list);
> +		list_del_rcu(&hdr->list);
>  		synchronize_rcu();
>  
>  		/*

Reinette


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29  0:33 [PATCH v4 00/31] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Drop rdt_mon_features variable Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-08 18:32     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 23:44       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-09 15:02   ` Peter Newman
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/31] fs/resctrl: Clean up rdtgroup_mba_mbps_event_{show,write}() Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/31] fs/resctrl: Change how and when events are initialized Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/31] fs/resctrl: Set up Kconfig options for telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-10  9:58   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-12 14:19     ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/31] x86/rectrl: Fake OOBMSM interface Tony Luck
2025-04-30 23:02   ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08  3:33   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:36   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:37   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:37   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/31] x86/resctrl: Change generic monitor functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:38   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 11/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 12/31] fs/resctrl: Improve handling for events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-13  3:19   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-13 16:20     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-14  9:11       ` Chen, Yu C
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 13/31] fs/resctrl: Add support for additional monitor event display formats Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:49   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-08 20:28     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 23:45       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-09 11:29         ` Dave Martin
2025-05-09 14:46           ` Peter Newman
2025-05-09 16:38             ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-09 16:43             ` Dave Martin
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/31] fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/31] x86/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 16/31] x86/resctrl: Add first part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 17/31] x86/resctrl: Add second " Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 18/31] x86/resctrl: Add third " Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 19/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 20/31] x86/resctrl: Check for adequate MMIO space Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 21/31] x86/resctrl: Add fourth part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 22/31] x86/resctrl: Read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 23/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 24/31] fs/resctrl: Add type define for PERF_PKG files Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 25/31] x86/resctrl: Final steps to enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 26/31] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 27/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:59   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 28/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fix RMID allocation for multiple monitor resources Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 29/31] fs/resctrl: Add interface for per-resource debug info files Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 30/31] x86/resctrl: Add info/PERF_PKG_MON/status file Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 31/31] x86/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ec7c62cc-61a1-42e5-a6b1-066fe7894611@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®