mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tobias Böhm" <tobias.boehm@hetzner-cloud.de>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de>
Cc: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sdn@hetzner-cloud.de
Subject: Re: [BUG] ixgbe: Detected Tx Unit Hang (XDP)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:19:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eca1880f-253a-4955-afe6-732d7c6926ee@hetzner-cloud.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAkz/+Rx5w3OHH4/@boxer>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5151 bytes --]

Am 23.04.25 um 20:39 schrieb Maciej Fijalkowski:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 04:20:07PM +0200, Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
>> Am 17.04.25 um 16:47 schrieb Maciej Fijalkowski:
>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:14:57AM +0200, Michal Kubiak wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
>>>>> Am 10.04.25 um 16:30 schrieb Michal Kubiak:
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:17:49PM +0200, Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in a setup where I use native XDP to redirect packets to a bonding interface
>>>>>>> that's backed by two ixgbe slaves, I noticed that the ixgbe driver constantly
>>>>>>> resets the NIC with the following kernel output:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    ixgbe 0000:01:00.1 ixgbe-x520-2: Detected Tx Unit Hang (XDP)
>>>>>>>      Tx Queue             <4>
>>>>>>>      TDH, TDT             <17e>, <17e>
>>>>>>>      next_to_use          <181>
>>>>>>>      next_to_clean        <17e>
>>>>>>>    tx_buffer_info[next_to_clean]
>>>>>>>      time_stamp           <0>
>>>>>>>      jiffies              <10025c380>
>>>>>>>    ixgbe 0000:01:00.1 ixgbe-x520-2: tx hang 19 detected on queue 4, resetting adapter
>>>>>>>    ixgbe 0000:01:00.1 ixgbe-x520-2: initiating reset due to tx timeout
>>>>>>>    ixgbe 0000:01:00.1 ixgbe-x520-2: Reset adapter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This only occurs in combination with a bonding interface and XDP, so I don't
>>>>>>> know if this is an issue with ixgbe or the bonding driver.
>>>>>>> I first discovered this with Linux 6.8.0-57, but kernel 6.14.0 and 6.15.0-rc1
>>>>>>> show the same issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I managed to reproduce this bug in a lab environment. Here are some details
>>>>>>> about my setup and the steps to reproduce the bug:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have any ideas what may be causing this issue or what I can do to
>>>>>>> diagnose this further?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know when I should provide any more information.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Hi Marcus,
>>>>
>>>>> thank you for looking into it. And not even 24 hours after my report, I'm
>>>>> very impressed! ;)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Interesting. I just tried again but had no luck yet with reproducing it
>>>>> without a bonding interface. May I ask how your setup looks like?
>>>>
>>>> For now, I've just grabbed the first available system with the HW
>>>> controlled by the "ixgbe" driver. In my case it was:
>>>>
>>>>    Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller X550
>>>>
>>>> Also, for my first attempt, I didn't use the upstream kernel - I just tried
>>>> the kernel installed on that system. It was the Fedora kernel:
>>>>
>>>>    6.12.8-200.fc41.x86_64
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think that may be the "beauty" of timing issues - sometimes you can change
>>>> just one piece in your system and get a completely different replication ratio.
>>>> Anyway, the higher the repro probability, the easier it is to debug
>>>> the timing problem. :-)
>>>
>>> Hi Marcus, to break the silence could you try to apply the diff below on
>>> your side?
>>
>> Hi, thank you for the patch. We've tried it and with your changes we can no
>> longer trigger the error and the NIC is no longer being reset.
>>
>>> We see several issues around XDP queues in ixgbe, but before we
>>> proceed let's this small change on your side.
>>
>> How confident are you that this patch is sufficient to make things stable enough
>> for production use? Was it just the Tx hang detection that was misbehaving for
>> the XDP case, or is there an underlying issue with the XDP queues that is not
>> solved by disabling the detection for it?
> 
> I believe that correct way to approach this is to move the Tx hang
> detection onto ixgbe_tx_timeout() as that is the place where this logic
> belongs to. By doing so I suppose we would kill two birds with one stone
> as mentioned ndo is called under netdev watchdog which is not a subject
> for XDP Tx queues.
> 
>>
>> With our current setup we cannot verify accurately, that we have no packet loss
>> or stuck queues. We can do additional tests to verify that.


Hi Maciej,

I'm a colleague of Marcus and involved in the testing as well.
>>> Additional question, do you have enabled pause frames on your setup?
>>
>> Pause frames were enabled, but we can also reproduce it after disabling them,
>> without your patch.
> 
> Please give your setup a go with pause frames enabled and applied patch
> that i shared previously and let us see the results. As said above I do
> not think it is correct to check for hung queues in Tx descriptor cleaning
> routine. This is a job of ndo_tx_timeout callback.
> 

We have tested with pause frames enabled and applied patch and can not 
trigger the error anymore in our lab setup.

>>
>> Thanks!
> 
> Thanks for feedback and testing. I'll provide a proper fix tomorrow and CC
> you so you could take it for a spin.
> 

That sounds great. We'd be happy to test with the proper fix in our 
original setup.

Thanks,
Tobias

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-24 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 15:17 Marcus Wichelmann
2025-04-10 14:30 ` Michal Kubiak
2025-04-10 14:54   ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-04-11  8:14     ` Michal Kubiak
2025-04-17 14:47       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-23 14:20         ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-04-23 18:39           ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-24 10:19             ` Tobias Böhm [this message]
2025-05-05 15:23               ` Tobias Böhm
2025-05-08 19:25                 ` Maciej Fijalkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eca1880f-253a-4955-afe6-732d7c6926ee@hetzner-cloud.de \
    --to=tobias.boehm@hetzner-cloud.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de \
    --cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdn@hetzner-cloud.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®