From: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@bisdn.de>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: iproc: reset bus after timeout if START_BUSY is stuck
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:26:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecaf734a-5d95-d68c-c6ee-0047eebc7883@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230904090005.52622-1-jonas.gorski@bisdn.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2762 bytes --]
Hi Jonas,
On 9/4/2023 2:00 AM, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> If a transaction times out, the START_BUSY signal may have gotten stuck,
> and subsequent transactaction attempts will fail as the bus is still
> considered busy.
>
> To work around this, check if the START_BUSY bit is still asserted, and
> reset the controller in case it is.
>
> This is also done by the alternative, non-upstream iproc-smbus driver
> implementation [1].
>
> Works around situations like:
>
> bcm-iproc-2c 1803b000.i2c: transaction timed out
> bcm-iproc-2c 1803b000.i2c: bus is busy
> bcm-iproc-2c 1803b000.i2c: bus is busy
> bcm-iproc-2c 1803b000.i2c: bus is busy
> bcm-iproc-2c 1803b000.i2c: bus is busy
> bcm-iproc-2c 1803b000.i2c: bus is busy
> ...
>
> where the bus never recovers after a timeout.
>
> [1] https://github.com/opencomputeproject/onie/blob/master/patches/kernel/3.2.69/driver-iproc-smbus.patch
>
> Fixes: e6e5dd3566e0 ("i2c: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc I2C Driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@bisdn.de>
> ---
> The iproc-smbus driver does some additional checks/mitigations, but
> since my I2C understanding is only very rudimentary, I didn't add them,
> also the reset was enough to fix the issue I was seeing.
>
> I was a bit conflicted about the Fixes tag, but since it fixes/work
> around misbehaviour seen I decided to add one.
>
> The issue was happening only in production, and only once per boot (so
> far), but with 100% probability within a few hours.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
> index 05c80680dff4..69f9c199fa3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,15 @@ static int bcm_iproc_i2c_xfer_wait(struct bcm_iproc_i2c_dev *iproc_i2c,
> if (!time_left && !iproc_i2c->xfer_is_done) {
> dev_err(iproc_i2c->device, "transaction timed out\n");
>
> + /* check if START_BUSY did not clear */
Can you please rephrase the comment to make it more clear?
For example, something like this:
/*
* If START_BUSY is still not clear, it means the controller may have
* been stuck. In this case, reset the controller to recover.
*/
> + if (!!(iproc_i2c_rd_reg(iproc_i2c, M_CMD_OFFSET) &
> + BIT(M_CMD_START_BUSY_SHIFT))) {
> + /* re-initialize i2c for recovery */
> + bcm_iproc_i2c_enable_disable(iproc_i2c, false);
> + bcm_iproc_i2c_init(iproc_i2c);
> + bcm_iproc_i2c_enable_disable(iproc_i2c, true);
> + }
> +
> /* flush both TX/RX FIFOs */
> val = BIT(M_FIFO_RX_FLUSH_SHIFT) | BIT(M_FIFO_TX_FLUSH_SHIFT);
> iproc_i2c_wr_reg(iproc_i2c, M_FIFO_CTRL_OFFSET, val);
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4194 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-04 9:00 Jonas Gorski
2023-09-05 16:26 ` Ray Jui [this message]
2023-09-05 22:53 ` Andi Shyti
2023-09-08 14:03 ` Jonas Gorski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ecaf734a-5d95-d68c-c6ee-0047eebc7883@broadcom.com \
--to=ray.jui@broadcom.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=cernekee@chromium.org \
--cc=jonas.gorski@bisdn.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome