mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@ping.uio.no>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: CFQ: Preemption/timeout logic reversed?
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:56:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed038eb20904191756y5a5bcf8fn53473405b3929de6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi!

It seems the preemption "bonus" logic in CFQ is reversed, a preempted
process is given an additional delay in start time instead of a bonus.
 This seems unfair.  I'm not sure if it's a good idea to let
slice_resid grow without limit as shown below, but isn't this more
like the way it was intended to work?  Or did I misunderstand
something?

PS! The comment above cfq_preempt_queue seems outdated too.

Code not tested, just showing what I mean:

diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 664ebfd..ea18d45 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -292,7 +292,8 @@ cfq_prio_to_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct
cfq_queue *cfqq)
 static inline void
 cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
 {
-       cfqq->slice_end = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies;
+       cfqq->slice_end = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) +
cfqq->slice_resid + jiffies;
+       cfqq->slice_resid = 0;
        cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "set_slice=%lu", cfqq->slice_end - jiffies);
 }

@@ -489,8 +490,6 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
                        rb_key += jiffies;
        } else if (!add_front) {
                rb_key = cfq_slice_offset(cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies;
-               rb_key += cfqq->slice_resid;
-               cfqq->slice_resid = 0;
        } else
                rb_key = 0;

@@ -1851,8 +1850,7 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct
cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
 }

 /*
- * cfqq preempts the active queue. if we allowed preempt with no slice left,
- * let it have half of its nominal slice.
+ * cfqq preempts the active queue.  start a new time slice.
  */
 static void cfq_preempt_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
 {


-- 
mvh
Carl Henrik

             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-20  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20  0:56 Carl Henrik Lunde [this message]
2009-04-20  6:16 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-20  6:48   ` Carl Henrik Lunde
2009-04-20  8:24     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed038eb20904191756y5a5bcf8fn53473405b3929de6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=chlunde@ping.uio.no \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®