From: Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@ping.uio.no>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: CFQ: Preemption/timeout logic reversed?
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:56:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed038eb20904191756y5a5bcf8fn53473405b3929de6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi!
It seems the preemption "bonus" logic in CFQ is reversed, a preempted
process is given an additional delay in start time instead of a bonus.
This seems unfair. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to let
slice_resid grow without limit as shown below, but isn't this more
like the way it was intended to work? Or did I misunderstand
something?
PS! The comment above cfq_preempt_queue seems outdated too.
Code not tested, just showing what I mean:
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 664ebfd..ea18d45 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -292,7 +292,8 @@ cfq_prio_to_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct
cfq_queue *cfqq)
static inline void
cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
{
- cfqq->slice_end = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies;
+ cfqq->slice_end = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) +
cfqq->slice_resid + jiffies;
+ cfqq->slice_resid = 0;
cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "set_slice=%lu", cfqq->slice_end - jiffies);
}
@@ -489,8 +490,6 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
rb_key += jiffies;
} else if (!add_front) {
rb_key = cfq_slice_offset(cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies;
- rb_key += cfqq->slice_resid;
- cfqq->slice_resid = 0;
} else
rb_key = 0;
@@ -1851,8 +1850,7 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct
cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
}
/*
- * cfqq preempts the active queue. if we allowed preempt with no slice left,
- * let it have half of its nominal slice.
+ * cfqq preempts the active queue. start a new time slice.
*/
static void cfq_preempt_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
{
--
mvh
Carl Henrik
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 0:56 Carl Henrik Lunde [this message]
2009-04-20 6:16 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-20 6:48 ` Carl Henrik Lunde
2009-04-20 8:24 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed038eb20904191756y5a5bcf8fn53473405b3929de6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chlunde@ping.uio.no \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®