From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760076AbYD2Hdt (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:33:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751404AbYD2Hdl (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:33:41 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]:55023 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751270AbYD2Hdk (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:33:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fdPsDxml7PczmxODKsgPBoa2wD2P54cpi3xZQOfpQNRNnX8yhLZkiUkJM1Kj6+c23TrObPkgFQvQ+TGWp8o0iPSpzIg/PRr6iCiqw+zIHnd3V1P0f3cox09AiPdELqZWSgV78aC1YRWeLpGc05k8tQwznemdEBMc5rj91/HwdHY= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:33:39 -0700 From: "SL Baur" To: "Greg KH" Subject: Re: patch usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree Cc: 12o3l@tiscali.nl, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080429065133.GA8708@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4806CF18.2050403@tiscali.nl> <12094267913945@kroah.org> <20080429065133.GA8708@suse.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 89ed6731658b1109 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/28/08, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:31:07PM -0700, SL Baur wrote: > Does that mean that the original patch is invalid? Or just that your > question was never answered? I think there are more of the same issues that the patch addressed in the same file and the patcher never responded back about that. -sb