From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754246AbYEAB4c@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754246AbYEAB4c (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:56:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754717AbYEAB4I
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:56:08 -0400
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:62830 "EHLO
	wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754389AbYEAB4G (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:56:06 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=U4KqN1nelG3bvG56BJpQQg/t7RR1HZdFqhEcHNiEX1u1D/qoOJiYxCgntKfEIVZt0ZhHKmCgGgjqC+EhnI7eGmdEswGqKQvbkCdwQRa2Ja+KOwNvhBmbjkhKFXABhGAks2Y28kezzspecnd3mvpJaQLTHBZnC7QWAjCB4RXO1a0=
Message-ID: <ed10ee420804301856u3ec1c5e6p453e929b899e926c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:56:05 -0700
From: "SL Baur" <steve@xemacs.org>
To: "Greg KH" <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: patch usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree
Cc: 12o3l@tiscali.nl, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20080430060359.GB10457@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4806CF18.2050403@tiscali.nl> <12094267913945@kroah.org>
	 <ed10ee420804282331x70acd75bv924767dc4cc1fdde@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080429065133.GA8708@suse.de>
	 <ed10ee420804290033v256238bas1f89542495d5b6b4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080430060359.GB10457@suse.de>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 15d047e722f0a15d
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 4/29/08, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:33:39AM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
>  > On 4/28/08, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
>  > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:31:07PM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
>  >
>  > > Does that mean that the original patch is invalid?  Or just that your
>  > >  question was never answered?
>  >
>  > I think there are more of the same issues that the patch
>  > addressed in the same file and the patcher never responded
>  > back about that.
>
>
> But again, is the current patch somehow not valid?

No, it's fine.

-sb