mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: use raw clock values consistently
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:54:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed5b7a36-b9a0-5436-c704-58c65966b7c2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1zqqode.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>

On 23/01/20 14:43, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> +
>> +static s64 get_kvmclock_base_ns(void)
>> +{
>> +	/* Count up from boot time, but with the frequency of the raw clock.  */
>> +	return ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(ktime_get_raw(), pvclock_gtod_data.offs_boot));
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static s64 get_kvmclock_base_ns(void)
>> +{
>> +	/* Master clock not used, so we can just use CLOCK_BOOTTIME.  */
>> +	return ktime_get_boottime_ns();
>> +}
>>  #endif
> But we could've still used the RAW+offs_boot version, right? And this is
> just to basically preserve the existing behavior on !x86.

Yes, there's no reason to restrict the pvclock_gtod notifier to x86_64.
 But this is stable material so I kept it easy.

>>
>> -	getboottime64(&boot);
>> +	wall_nsec = ktime_get_real_ns() - get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
> 
> There are not that many hosts with more than 50 years uptime and likely
> none running Linux with live kernel patching support so I bet noone will
> ever see this overflowing, however, as wall_nsec is u64 and we're
> dealing with kvmclock here I'd suggest to add a WARN_ON().

You're off by a factor of 10, 2^64 nanoseconds are about 584 years
(584*365*10^9*86400). :)

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 14:22 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: do not mix raw and monotonic clocks in kvmclock Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: reorganize pvclock_gtod_data members Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-23 11:32   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-23 11:35     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: use raw clock values consistently Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-23 13:43   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-23 13:54     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-01-24 20:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: do not mix raw and monotonic clocks in kvmclock Marcelo Tosatti
2020-01-25  9:42   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed5b7a36-b9a0-5436-c704-58c65966b7c2@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®