From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764305AbZE0Ojh (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 10:39:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759849AbZE0Oj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 10:39:29 -0400 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.24]:51762 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759714AbZE0Oj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 10:39:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Sy1xxAafqjZ5dM2F3rEtriVVAF0XExxSI+oM3IwFZZ5o2Dh7aK2kgHHMbXQpuLRukM 5hoTBpDpLMSgFe9vvQyDgJ8j+ZtNXRdtyKWVJAtveehQ2uQrXT2zgdKgv2BgHUnVzffP jjYlURcrhTVC2t8SqSA9bG0wY8qTlXE2yMbm4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1243408083.13460.14.camel@debian-nb> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:39:30 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 93f5b33509791fb4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform From: Timur Tabi To: Janboe Ye Cc: Grant Likely , devicetree-discuss , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >> Signed-off-by: janboe > > Heeheehe, This is Fantastic. Yes, I agree. Thanks for working on this. I was hoping to work on it myself later this year. Freescale develops both ARM-based and PowerPC-based SOCs, and some devices are shared between them (e.g. the SSI). Lack of device-tree support on ARM has been a real hindrance to getting the ARM-based Linux support on par with PowerPC. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale