From: Markus Probst <markus.probst@posteo.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joshua Rogers <linux@joshua.hu>,
stable <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serdev: fix race between tty-port unregister and in-flight callbacks
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:30:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edd75d5a4362e5c8e7b691f65768d1fedc30309a.camel@posteo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-aisle-tty-serdev-v1-1-2401a3189327@linuxfoundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2598 bytes --]
On Fri, 2026-07-31 at 10:06 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Joshua Rogers <linux@joshua.hu>
>
> serdev_tty_port_unregister() clears port->client_data and frees the
> controller without synchronizing with in-flight flip buffer work.
> This can cause NULL pointer dereferences or use-after-free if
> ttyport_receive_buf() or ttyport_write_wakeup() runs concurrently.
>
> Add cancel_work_sync() to drain pending buffer work before clearing
> state, and add NULL checks for client_data in both callbacks as
> secondary hardening.
>
> Assisted-by: AISLE:Snapshot
> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Rogers <linux@joshua.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> index bab1b143b8a6..48ce5b3f8308 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,14 @@ static size_t ttyport_receive_buf(struct tty_port *port, const u8 *cp,
> const u8 *fp, size_t count)
> {
> struct serdev_controller *ctrl = port->client_data;
> - struct serport *serport = serdev_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> + struct serport *serport;
> size_t ret;
>
> + if (!ctrl)
> + return 0;
> +
> + serport = serdev_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> +
> if (!test_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -46,9 +51,14 @@ static size_t ttyport_receive_buf(struct tty_port *port, const u8 *cp,
> static void ttyport_write_wakeup(struct tty_port *port)
> {
> struct serdev_controller *ctrl = port->client_data;
> - struct serport *serport = serdev_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> + struct serport *serport;
> struct tty_struct *tty;
>
> + if (!ctrl)
> + return;
> +
> + serport = serdev_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> +
> tty = tty_port_tty_get(port);
> if (!tty)
> return;
> @@ -312,6 +322,7 @@ int serdev_tty_port_unregister(struct tty_port *port)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> serdev_controller_remove(ctrl);
> + cancel_work_sync(&port->buf.work);
> port->client_data = NULL;
> port->client_ops = &tty_port_default_client_ops;
> serdev_controller_put(ctrl);
So why exactly does tty keep calling `receive_buf` and `write_wakeup`
with the tty port closed?
After `serdev_controller_remove` is called, the tty port should already
be closed by the drivers.
Thanks
- Markus Probst
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 870 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 8:06 [PATCH 0/2] serdev: Some small serdev bugfixes found by code scans Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] serdev: fix race between tty-port unregister and in-flight callbacks Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 11:30 ` Markus Probst [this message]
2026-07-31 12:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 12:43 ` Markus Probst
2026-07-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] serdev: use tty_port_tty_get() in ttyport_write_buf() to prevent UAF Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 8:24 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-07-31 8:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 13:00 ` Markus Probst
2026-07-31 13:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 13:30 ` Markus Probst
2026-07-31 8:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] serdev: Some small serdev bugfixes found by code scans Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edd75d5a4362e5c8e7b691f65768d1fedc30309a.camel@posteo.de \
--to=markus.probst@posteo.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@joshua.hu \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®