From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29C2C77B73 for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 14:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243865AbjEZOgn (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2023 10:36:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59600 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243680AbjEZOgk (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2023 10:36:40 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F18CE6B for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 07:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-760dff4b701so5586039f.0 for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 07:36:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1685111725; x=1687703725; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KFFVe4fGYi3lSzHHYAx7oZd/Y8MYWtHHZ3YLr2pVYiw=; b=i8uvdX5BpdRP8Dn0HfqxN7STLSNfUe7bxQXVwRVDQmx6rvcasY/E4RCghiZy33Kmvq n0WFuUxHseYhRXVywFcGHG/1mC5DXwYalAzUtXWSjwuqzVWBMZTZxnvDSh3LImySwqJ6 sHjZ974U7yzsxaNECeu3Qy3dzPim4npkI9zV+dMSRUmytUeD7OoITSvNEelmLILGi1rf 5KwSrJHGVBPmiIKfoWrB5F2fkoRFLbZ4aj8V3yN2T9cSRW/je6eOhBsB8UoozaYshF/7 fB5zgpzDne+o4nk7I5ReQZg8rIpQqbnvSFgKfDOA3bC+0VroF6zt04WVXAHBxp4JcAej ce0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685111725; x=1687703725; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KFFVe4fGYi3lSzHHYAx7oZd/Y8MYWtHHZ3YLr2pVYiw=; b=U8n317SHSCDPWUoACsHlh7Wm5h3dFaWTKlKveRfJROyOKvZ9urAscJlD0fMTL9JMCA ebdw9TLdaCpWCBVDoSgB5QVD6iBaICcbhry5RFM95fgwFP8CzQ3fJ2Y6kl7lAwvfqnjP 7v/X2/J25DyEjYEivPL26araRr0xd3aE1skQaed7CTRxwWSN/LuzkZ1Ib7oKRY2rH99C SkVbqEPGDgvbTP60frZf/bTy90JssFeD94Z9InQqtPnUJKFMZiJG8wlIpajopowIViau uwEKgK3YzFqI+I/aUNwLAkUu0aaAOF45kK4G+J7E44iHOfG6sz86JPPkehRbj09imtvW 7wWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzzEiDqcMZReb1rUHPhQXKEfprP/Xe7AJjtqnLcPA8cqv3wXYHQ viYBHTwkJmYMS2B40g5Waty2sw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ47qy3YTiOTh7HZPsI0BEt4acqoW4nesrAMlklT8drGr0J0cxVJzlB63FvXOgbacG8hNmN+kQ== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3b8d:0:b0:774:9337:2d4c with SMTP id i135-20020a6b3b8d000000b0077493372d4cmr923464ioa.1.1685111725035; Fri, 26 May 2023 07:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.94] ([96.43.243.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v6-20020a02cba6000000b004183d110f0dsm1188836jap.86.2023.05.26.07.35.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 May 2023 07:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 08:35:23 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs Content-Language: en-US To: Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230525214822.2725616-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <20230525214822.2725616-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/25/23 3:48 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Jens, here's the full series of block layer patches needed for bcachefs: > > Some of these (added exports, zero_fill_bio_iter?) can probably go with > the bcachefs pull and I'm just including here for completeness. The main > ones are the bio_iter patches, and the __invalidate_super() patch. > > The bio_iter series has a new documentation patch. > > I would still like the __invalidate_super() patch to get some review > (from VFS people? unclear who owns this). I wanted to check the code generation for patches 4 and 5, but the series doesn't seem to apply to current -git nor my for-6.5/block. There's no base commit in this cover letter either, so what is this against? Please send one that applies to for-6.5/block so it's a bit easier to take a closer look at this. -- Jens Axboe