From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] timekeeping: don't use seqcount loop in ktime_mono_to_any on 64-bit arch
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:32:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee39e467d23070c00aa39f12895fe346406f527f.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qvzbtz1.ffs@tglx>
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 13:58 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10 2024 at 07:17, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> Please describe functions with foo() and not foo. Also please refrain
> from using abbreviations. The 'arch' above is not really useful.
>
> 64-bit systems perhaps?
>
Thanks, will fix.
> > ktime_mono_to_any only fetches the offset inside the loop. This is a
> > single word on 64-bit arch, and seqcount_read_begin implies a full SMP
> > barrier. While we do want to use the latest offset value available, a
>
> We do nothing.
>
I assume you mean "we do not". Fair enough. I misinterpreted the
purpose of the seqcount loop then.
> > full seqcount loop is overkill on 64-bit, where there is no possibility
> > of torn reads. Just do a READ_ONCE for that and don't bother with the
> > seqcount.
>
> don't bother is not really a technical term.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#changelog
>
Thanks, fixed.
> > +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > +ktime_t ktime_mono_to_any(ktime_t tmono, enum tk_offsets offs)
> > +{
> > + ktime_t *offset = offsets[offs];
> > +
> > + return ktime_add(tmono, READ_ONCE(*offset));
>
> Where is the corresponing WRITE_ONCE()?
>
I'll just make it do a simple fetch without READ_ONCE.
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_mono_to_any);
> > +#else /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_mono_to_any);
> > +#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
>
> Why do we need this export twice?
>
We don't (obviously). I wasn't sure whether it was preferred to put it
inside the #ifdef.
Now that I look though, the resulting helper is very simple. Would it
be better to make this a static inline instead of an exported symbol?
----------------8<----------------
ktime_t ktime_mono_to_any(ktime_t tmono, enum tk_offsets offs)
{
ktime_t *offset = offsets[offs];
return ktime_add(tmono, *offset);
}
----------------8<----------------
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 11:17 Jeff Layton
2024-09-10 11:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-10 12:32 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-09-10 15:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee39e467d23070c00aa39f12895fe346406f527f.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®