From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751775AbWF1XYW (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:24:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751778AbWF1XYW (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:24:22 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:46413 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751777AbWF1XYU (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:24:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=MiE9oBgtQkhpL96N6HE7a4G3h8XAC7rQPQIOqVr5zObihxrdlRvQojv8bvgwaoqM0dKbCqxshV+zKOJ5Vng+KbVzP0nrOXjiiqJ1qMx/lAcAuA2/TFN6n5IWxStN1YI+QQhP/V3j5kY4gGix1oWKzlO+xunrwIcThA6sR8LI+rY= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:24:19 -0700 From: "Russ Cox" To: "Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte" Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [Patch] Dead code in fs/9p/vfs_inode.c Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20060628231627.GA28463@alice> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1151535167.28311.1.camel@alice> <20060628231627.GA28463@alice> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b577d39be705952b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If this is whats agreed upon I will no longer send patches for > such bugs, and mark them as ignore in the coverity system. > But I guess it makes also sense to remove unused code, because I > am not sure if gcc can figure out to remove it. In this case > the generated object file is 10 bytes smaller. I wasn't necessarily speaking for the group so much as I was interested in how coverity was being used and what the rules were. Thanks for the info. Russ